These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27743280)

  • 1. Item Response Theory Observed-Score Kernel Equating.
    Andersson B; Wiberg M
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):48-66. PubMed ID: 27743280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of IRT Observed Score Kernel Equating and Several Equating Methods.
    Wang S; Zhang M; You S
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():308. PubMed ID: 32210877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency Analysis of Item Response Theory Kernel Equating for Mixed-Format Tests.
    Wallmark J; Josefsson M; Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):496-512. PubMed ID: 38027462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Standard Errors of Kernel Equating: Accounting for Bandwidth Estimation.
    Marcq K; Andersson B
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):200-218. PubMed ID: 35528269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating Equating Transformations in IRT Observed-Score and Kernel Equating Methods.
    Leôncio W; Wiberg M; Battauz M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Mar; 47(2):123-140. PubMed ID: 36875292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kernel Equating Under the Non-Equivalent Groups With Covariates Design.
    Wiberg M; Bränberg K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):349-361. PubMed ID: 29881012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal stability of IRT and equivalent-groups linear and equipercentile equating.
    Zhang X; McDermott PA; Fantuzzo JW; Gadsden VL
    Psychol Rep; 2013 Aug; 113(1):1303-25. PubMed ID: 24340818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Equating Errors and Scale Drift in Linked-Chain IRT Equating with Mixed-Format Tests.
    Hu B
    J Appl Meas; 2018; 19(1):41-58. PubMed ID: 29561741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. IRT test equating in complex linkage plans.
    Battauz M
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):464-80. PubMed ID: 25106395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Item Response Theory True Score Equating for the Bifactor Model Under the Common-Item Nonequivalent Groups Design.
    Kim KY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Sep; 46(6):479-493. PubMed ID: 35991829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
    De Champlain AF
    Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Item response theory test equating in health sciences education.
    Guilera G; Gómez J
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16847729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alternative Linear Item Response Theory Observed-Score Equating Methods.
    Wiberg M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 May; 40(3):180-199. PubMed ID: 29881047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approximating Bifactor IRT True-Score Equating With a Projective Item Response Model.
    Kim KY; Cho UH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):215-218. PubMed ID: 32341608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A primer on standardized testing:
    Himelfarb I
    J Chiropr Educ; 2019 Oct; 33(2):151-163. PubMed ID: 31169998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the 0.3 logits screening criterion in common item equating.
    Miller GE; Rotou O; Twing JS
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 15064536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linking Item Response Model Parameters.
    van der Linden WJ; Barrett MD
    Psychometrika; 2016 Sep; 81(3):650-73. PubMed ID: 26155754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of proficiency in an anesthesiology course across distinct medical student cohorts: psychometric approaches to test equating.
    Liao SW; Chang KY; Ting CK; Tsou MY; Chen ET; Chan KH; Chang WK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2014 Mar; 77(3):150-4. PubMed ID: 24290232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validating standard setting with a modified nedelsky procedure through common item test equating.
    Smith RM; Gross LJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 9661719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple Equating of Separate IRT Calibrations.
    Battauz M
    Psychometrika; 2016 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 27699559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.