These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27743489)

  • 1. Prostate Health Index improves multivariable risk prediction of aggressive prostate cancer.
    Loeb S; Shin SS; Broyles DL; Wei JT; Sanda M; Klee G; Partin AW; Sokoll L; Chan DW; Bangma CH; van Schaik RHN; Slawin KM; Marks LS; Catalona WJ
    BJU Int; 2017 Jul; 120(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 27743489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improving multivariable prostate cancer risk assessment using the Prostate Health Index.
    Foley RW; Gorman L; Sharifi N; Murphy K; Moore H; Tuzova AV; Perry AS; Murphy TB; Lundon DJ; Watson RW
    BJU Int; 2016 Mar; 117(3):409-17. PubMed ID: 25847734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators significantly outperform the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) 2.0 in the prediction of prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study.
    Foley RW; Maweni RM; Gorman L; Murphy K; Lundon DJ; Durkan G; Power R; O'Brien F; O'Malley KJ; Galvin DJ; Brendan Murphy T; William Watson R
    BJU Int; 2016 Nov; 118(5):706-713. PubMed ID: 26833820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate cancer risk assessment tools in an unscreened population.
    Lundon DJ; Kelly BD; Foley R; Loeb S; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW; Rogers E; Durkan GC; Walsh K
    World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 25091862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observational study comparing the accuracy/variability between the ERSPC and the PCPT risk calculators for the prediction of significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA <10 ng/mL.
    Gomez Gomez E; Salamanca Bustos JJ; Carrasco Valiente J; Fernandez Rueda JL; Blanca A; Valero Rosa J; Bravo Arrebola I; Marquez López J; Jimenez Vacas JM; Luque R; Requena Tapia MJ
    BMJ Open; 2019 Nov; 9(11):e031032. PubMed ID: 31722940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Importance of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group.
    Roobol MJ; Schröder FH; Hugosson J; Jones JS; Kattan MW; Klein EA; Hamdy F; Neal D; Donovan J; Parekh DJ; Ankerst D; Bartsch G; Klocker H; Horninger W; Benchikh A; Salama G; Villers A; Freedland SJ; Moreira DM; Vickers AJ; Lilja H; Steyerberg EW
    World J Urol; 2012 Apr; 30(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 22203238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prediction of prostate cancer risk: the role of prostate volume and digital rectal examination in the ERSPC risk calculators.
    Roobol MJ; van Vugt HA; Loeb S; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; van Leenders AG; Steyerberg EW; Schröder FH
    Eur Urol; 2012 Mar; 61(3):577-83. PubMed ID: 22104592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The added value of percentage of free to total prostate-specific antigen, PCA3, and a kallikrein panel to the ERSPC risk calculator for prostate cancer in prescreened men.
    Vedder MM; de Bekker-Grob EW; Lilja HG; Vickers AJ; van Leenders GJ; Steyerberg EW; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1109-15. PubMed ID: 25168616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phi-based risk calculators performed better in the prediction of prostate cancer in the Chinese population.
    Wu YS; Fu XJ; Na R; Ye DW; Qi J; Lin XL; Liu F; Gong J; Zhang N; Jiang GL; Jiang HW; Ding Q; Xu J; Sun YH
    Asian J Androl; 2019; 21(6):592-597. PubMed ID: 30924451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of two on-line risk calculators versus the detection of circulating prostate cells for the detection of high risk prostate cancer at first biopsy.].
    Murray NP; Fuentealba C; Reyes E; Jacob O
    Arch Esp Urol; 2017 Jun; 70(5):503-512. PubMed ID: 28613202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prostate cancer risk prediction using the novel versions of the European Randomised Study for Screening of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) and Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) risk calculators: independent validation and comparison in a contemporary European cohort.
    Poyet C; Nieboer D; Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Wiederkehr C; Wettstein MS; Largo R; Wild P; Sulser T; Hermanns T
    BJU Int; 2016 Mar; 117(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 26332503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The percentage of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform [-2]proPSA and the Prostate Health Index improve the diagnostic accuracy for clinically relevant prostate cancer at initial and repeat biopsy compared with total PSA and percentage free PSA in men aged ≤65 years.
    Boegemann M; Stephan C; Cammann H; Vincendeau S; Houlgatte A; Jung K; Blanchet JS; Semjonow A
    BJU Int; 2016 Jan; 117(1):72-9. PubMed ID: 25818705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Multicentre Evaluation of the Role of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in Regions with Differing Prevalence of Prostate Cancer: Adjustment of PHI Reference Ranges is Needed for European and Asian Settings.
    Chiu PK; Ng CF; Semjonow A; Zhu Y; Vincendeau S; Houlgatte A; Lazzeri M; Guazzoni G; Stephan C; Haese A; Bruijne I; Teoh JY; Leung CH; Casale P; Chiang CH; Tan LG; Chiong E; Huang CY; Wu HC; Nieboer D; Ye DW; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):558-561. PubMed ID: 30396635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer.
    Nordström T; Vickers A; Assel M; Lilja H; Grönberg H; Eklund M
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jul; 68(1):139-46. PubMed ID: 25151013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reducing unnecessary biopsies while detecting clinically significant prostate cancer including cribriform growth with the ERSPC Rotterdam risk calculator and 4Kscore.
    Verbeek JFM; Bangma CH; Kweldam CF; van der Kwast TH; Kümmerlin IP; van Leenders GJLH; Roobol MJ
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Feb; 37(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 30528698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the prostate health index in a predictive model of prostate cancer.
    Sanchís-Bonet A; Barrionuevo-González M; Bajo-Chueca AM; Pulido-Fonseca L; Ortega-Polledo LE; Tamayo-Ruiz JC; Sánchez-Chapado M
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2018; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 28811062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Positive predictive value of prostate biopsy indicated by prostate-specific-antigen-based prostate cancer screening: trends over time in a European randomized trial*.
    Bokhorst LP; Zhu X; Bul M; Bangma CH; Schröder FH; Roobol MJ
    BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1654-60. PubMed ID: 23043563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extended use of Prostate Health Index and percentage of [-2]pro-prostate-specific antigen in Chinese men with prostate specific antigen 10-20 ng/mL and normal digital rectal examination.
    Chiu PK; Teoh JY; Lee WM; Yee CH; Chan ES; Hou SM; Ng CF
    Investig Clin Urol; 2016 Sep; 57(5):336-42. PubMed ID: 27617315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.