962 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27743953)
1. FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography in Nonculprit Lesions of Patients With Recent STEMI.
Gaur S; Taylor CA; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft AK; Holm NR; Leipsic J; Zarins CK; Achenbach S; Khem S; Wilk A; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 10(4):424-433. PubMed ID: 27743953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of lesion-specific ischemia using fractional flow reserve (FFR) profiles derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (FFRCT) and invasive pressure measurements (FFRINV): Importance of the site of measurement and implications for patient referral for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
Cami E; Tagami T; Raff G; Fonte TA; Renard B; Gallagher MJ; Chinnaiyan K; Bilolikar A; Fan A; Hafeez A; Safian RD
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(6):480-492. PubMed ID: 30274795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Coronary CT-based FFR in patients with acute myocardial infarction might predict follow-up invasive FFR: The XPECT-MI study.
Boussoussou M; Édes IF; Nowotta F; Vattay B; Vecsey-Nagy M; Drobni Z; Simon J; Kolossváry M; Németh B; Jermendy ÁL; Becker D; Leipsic J; Rogers C; Collinsworth A; Maurovich-Horvat P; Merkely B; Szilveszter B
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2023; 17(4):269-276. PubMed ID: 37244776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial.
Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does the Routine Availability of CT-Derived FFR Influence Management of Patients With Stable Chest Pain Compared to CT Angiography Alone?: The FFR
Curzen NP; Nolan J; Zaman AG; Nørgaard BL; Rajani R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Oct; 9(10):1188-1194. PubMed ID: 27568119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy and discrimination of ischemia by fractional flow reserve CT using a clinical use rule: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic Computed Tomographic Angiography study.
Thompson AG; Raju R; Blanke P; Yang TH; Mancini GB; Budoff MJ; Norgaard BL; Min JK; Leipsic JA
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 25819194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical Use of Coronary CTA-Derived FFR for Decision-Making in Stable CAD.
Nørgaard BL; Hjort J; Gaur S; Hansson N; Bøtker HE; Leipsic J; Mathiassen ON; Grove EL; Pedersen K; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Gormsen LC; Mæng M; Terkelsen CJ; Kristensen SD; Krusell LR; Jensen JM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 May; 10(5):541-550. PubMed ID: 27085447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A novel noninvasive technology for treatment planning using virtual coronary stenting and computed tomography-derived computed fractional flow reserve.
Kim KH; Doh JH; Koo BK; Min JK; Erglis A; Yang HM; Park KW; Lee HY; Kang HJ; Kim YJ; Lee SY; Kim HS
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jan; 7(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 24332418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive CT-derived fractional flow reserve and static rest and stress CT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Ko BS; Linde JJ; Ihdayhid AR; Norgaard BL; Kofoed KF; Sørgaard M; Adams D; Crossett M; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Nov; 35(11):2103-2112. PubMed ID: 31273632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT angiography (CTA) and diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve: results from the Determination of Fractional Flow Reserve by Anatomic CTA (DeFACTO) study.
Leipsic J; Yang TH; Thompson A; Koo BK; Mancini GB; Taylor C; Budoff MJ; Park HB; Berman DS; Min JK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 May; 202(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 24758651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optimized interpretation of fractional flow reserve derived from computed tomography: Comparison of three interpretation methods.
Takagi H; Ishikawa Y; Orii M; Ota H; Niiyama M; Tanaka R; Morino Y; Yoshioka K
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2019; 13(2):134-141. PubMed ID: 30385326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice.
Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting the Physiological Effect of Revascularization in Serially Diseased Coronary Arteries.
Modi BN; Sankaran S; Kim HJ; Ellis H; Rogers C; Taylor CA; Rajani R; Perera D
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Feb; 12(2):e007577. PubMed ID: 30722688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective Comparison of FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography With SPECT Perfusion Imaging in Stable Coronary Artery Disease: The ReASSESS Study.
Sand NPR; Veien KT; Nielsen SS; Nørgaard BL; Larsen P; Johansen A; Hess S; Deibjerg L; Husain M; Junker A; Thomsen KK; Rohold A; Jensen LO
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 11(11):1640-1650. PubMed ID: 29909103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress Computed Tomography Perfusion Versus Fractional Flow Reserve CT Derived in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: The PERFECTION Study.
Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Fazzari F; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Lualdi A; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Aug; 12(8 Pt 1):1487-1497. PubMed ID: 30343073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.
Lu MT; Ferencik M; Roberts RS; Lee KL; Ivanov A; Adami E; Mark DB; Jaffer FA; Leipsic JA; Douglas PS; Hoffmann U
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 10(11):1350-1358. PubMed ID: 28412436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rationale and design of the HeartFlowNXT (HeartFlow analysis of coronary blood flow using CT angiography: NeXt sTeps) study.
Gaur S; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Mauri L; Bezerra HG; Jensen JM; Bøtker HE; Lassen JF; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2013; 7(5):279-88. PubMed ID: 24268114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: variation of repeated analyses.
Gaur S; Bezerra HG; Lassen JF; Christiansen EH; Tanaka K; Jensen JM; Oldroyd KG; Leipsic J; Achenbach S; Kaltoft AK; Bøtker HE; Nørgaard BL
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 25151923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard.
Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Evaluating Nonculprit Lesions After Myocardial Infarction: Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve.
Everaars H; van der Hoeven NW; Janssens GN; van Leeuwen MA; van Loon RB; Schumacher SP; Demirkiran A; Hofman MBM; van der Geest RJ; van de Ven PM; Götte MJ; van Rossum AC; van Royen N; Nijveldt R
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Mar; 13(3):715-728. PubMed ID: 31542525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
