These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27744261)
1. Selection of invasive wild pig countermeasures using multicriteria decision analysis. Brondum MC; Collier ZA; Luke CS; Goatcher BL; Linkov I Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 574():1164-1173. PubMed ID: 27744261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study. Smith AL; Strickland BK; Leopold BD; Cummins JL; Mayer JJ; Street GM J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 338():117742. PubMed ID: 37001426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mixed ancestry from wild and domestic lineages contributes to the rapid expansion of invasive feral swine. Smyser TJ; Tabak MA; Slootmaker C; Robeson MS; Miller RS; Bosse M; Megens HJ; Groenen MAM; Paiva SR; de Faria DA; Blackburn HD; Schmit BS; Piaggio AJ Mol Ecol; 2020 Mar; 29(6):1103-1119. PubMed ID: 32080922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas. McLean HE; Teel TL; Bright AD; Jaebker LM; Tomecek JM; Frank MG; Connally RL; Shwiff SA; Carlisle KM J Environ Manage; 2021 May; 285():112143. PubMed ID: 33631484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What can decision analysis do for invasive species management? Maguire LA Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):859-68. PubMed ID: 15357805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States. Grady MJ; Harper EE; Carlisle KM; Ernst KH; Shwiff SA J Environ Manage; 2019 May; 237():488-494. PubMed ID: 30825781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States. McClure ML; Burdett CL; Farnsworth ML; Lutman MW; Theobald DM; Riggs PD; Grear DA; Miller RS PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133771. PubMed ID: 26267266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama. TuckerWilliams E; Lepczyk CA; Morse W; Smith M Environ Manage; 2024 May; 73(5):1032-1048. PubMed ID: 38466407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inferring invasive species abundance using removal data from management actions. Davis AJ; Hooten MB; Miller RS; Farnsworth ML; Lewis J; Moxcey M; Pepin KM Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):2339-2346. PubMed ID: 27755739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors and costs associated with removal of a newly established population of invasive wild pigs in Northern U.S. Fischer JW; Snow NP; Wilson BE; Beckerman SF; Jacques CN; VanNatta EH; Kay SL; VerCauteren KC Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):11528. PubMed ID: 32661318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Changes in wild pig (Sus scrofa) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts. Treichler JW; VerCauteren KC; Taylor CR; Beasley JC Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Dec; 79(12):4765-4773. PubMed ID: 37462084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Potential secondary poisoning risks to non-targets from a sodium nitrite toxic bait for invasive wild pigs. Snow NP; Foster JA; VanNatta EH; Horak KE; Humphrys ST; Staples LD; Hewitt DG; VerCauteren KC Pest Manag Sci; 2018 Jan; 74(1):181-188. PubMed ID: 28762643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monitoring wild pig populations: a review of methods. Engeman RM; Massei G; Sage M; Gentle MN Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2013 Nov; 20(11):8077-91. PubMed ID: 23881593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exposure of a population of invasive wild pigs to simulated toxic bait containing biomarker: implications for population reduction. Snow NP; Lavelle MJ; Halseth JM; Glow MP; VanNatta EH; Davis AJ; Pepin KM; Tabor RT; Leland BR; Staples LD; VerCauteren KC Pest Manag Sci; 2019 Apr; 75(4):1140-1149. PubMed ID: 30324708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multi-level movement response of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) to removal. Bastille-Rousseau G; Schlichting PE; Keiter DA; Smith JB; Kilgo JC; Wittemyer G; Vercauteren KC; Beasley JC; Pepin KM Pest Manag Sci; 2021 Jan; 77(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 32738020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cytochrome b based genetic differentiation of Indian wild pig (Sus scrofa cristatus) and domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica) and its use in wildlife forensics. Gupta SK; Kumar A; Hussain SA; Vipin ; Singh L Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 23601732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessing whole-sounder removal versus traditional control for reducing invasive wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations. Kilgo JC; Vukovich M; Cox KJ; Larsen M; Mims TT; Garabedian JE Pest Manag Sci; 2023 Sep; 79(9):3033-3042. PubMed ID: 36966457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs. Tucker Williams E; Lepczyk CA; Morse W; Smith M PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246457. PubMed ID: 33544753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying eradication success: the removal of feral pigs from Santa Cruz Island, California. Ramsey DS; Parkes J; Morrison SA Conserv Biol; 2009 Apr; 23(2):449-59. PubMed ID: 19040652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Governmental provisions to manage and eradicate feral swine in areas of the United States. Centner TJ; Shuman RM Ambio; 2015 Mar; 44(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 24845195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]