325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27744325)
1. Evaluation of predictors of unfavorable pathological features in men eligible for active surveillance using radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.
Mizuno K; Inoue T; Kinoshita H; Yano T; Kawanishi H; Kanda H; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Kamba T; Mikami Y; Shiraishi T; Uemura Y; Imai Y; Honjo G; Shirase T; Okumura K; Kawakita M; Ogura K; Sugimura Y; Matsuda T; Ogawa O
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 27744325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Population based study of predictors of adverse pathology among candidates for active surveillance with Gleason 6 prostate cancer.
Vellekoop A; Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Stattin P
J Urol; 2014 Feb; 191(2):350-7. PubMed ID: 24071481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate-specific antigen vs prostate-specific antigen density as a predictor of upgrading in men diagnosed with Gleason 6 prostate cancer by contemporary multicore prostate biopsy.
Oh JJ; Hong SK; Lee JK; Lee BK; Lee S; Kwon OS; Byun SS; Lee SE
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E494-9. PubMed ID: 22540236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pathological upgrading in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance: Does prostate-specific antigen density matter?
Jin BS; Kang SH; Kim DY; Oh HG; Kim CI; Moon GH; Kwon TG; Park JS
Korean J Urol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):624-9. PubMed ID: 26366274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detailed biopsy pathologic features as predictive factors for initial reclassification in prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.
Ploussard G; de la Taille A; Terry S; Allory Y; Ouzaïd I; Vacherot F; Abbou CC; Salomon L
Urol Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(7):1060-6. PubMed ID: 22300755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological findings and prostate specific antigen outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men eligible for active surveillance--does the risk of misclassification vary according to biopsy criteria?
Ploussard G; Salomon L; Xylinas E; Allory Y; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):539-44. PubMed ID: 20006888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unilateral positive biopsies in low risk prostate cancer patients diagnosed with extended transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy schemes do not predict unilateral prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Gallina A; Maccagnano C; Suardi N; Capitanio U; Abdollah F; Raber M; Salonia A; Scattoni V; Rigatti P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(2 Pt 2):E64-8. PubMed ID: 22093108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low prostate-specific antigen and no Gleason score upgrade despite more extensive cancer during active surveillance predicts insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy.
Han JS; Toll AD; Amin A; Carter HB; Landis P; Lee S; Epstein JI
Urology; 2012 Oct; 80(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 22921697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Perlis N; Sayyid R; Evans A; Van Der Kwast T; Toi A; Finelli A; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Ghai S; Fleshner NE
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 27457260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?
Aghazadeh MA; Frankel J; Belanger M; McLaughlin T; Tortora J; Staff I; Wagner JR
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1196-1201. PubMed ID: 29288120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adverse Disease Features in Gleason Score 3 + 4 "Favorable Intermediate-Risk" Prostate Cancer: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Gearman DJ; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2017 Sep; 72(3):442-447. PubMed ID: 27574819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying Men Who Can Remain on Active Surveillance Despite Biopsy Reclassification to Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer.
Baraban E; Erak E; Fatima A; Akbari A; Zhao J; Fletcher SA; Bhanji Y; de la Calle CM; Mamawala M; Landis P; Macura KJ; Pavlovich CP; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2023 Jul; 210(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 37042826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pathological outcomes of Japanese men eligible for active surveillance after radical prostatectomy.
Inoue T; Kinoshita H; Inui H; Komai Y; Nakagawa M; Oguchi N; Kawa G; Sugi M; Ohe C; Miyasaka C; Nakano Y; Sakaida N; Uemura Y; Matsuda T
Int J Clin Oncol; 2014 Apr; 19(2):379-83. PubMed ID: 23546546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can we expand active surveillance criteria to include biopsy Gleason 3+4 prostate cancer? A multi-institutional study of 2,323 patients.
Ploussard G; Isbarn H; Briganti A; Sooriakumaran P; Surcel CI; Salomon L; Freschi M; Mirvald C; van der Poel HG; Jenkins A; Ost P; van Oort IM; Yossepowitch O; Giannarini G; van den Bergh RC;
Urol Oncol; 2015 Feb; 33(2):71.e1-9. PubMed ID: 25131660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percentage of cancer involvement in positive cores can predict unfavorable disease in men with low-risk prostate cancer but eligible for the prostate cancer international: active surveillance criteria.
Russo GI; Cimino S; Castelli T; Favilla V; Urzì D; Veroux M; Madonia M; Morgia G
Urol Oncol; 2014 Apr; 32(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24184119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Selecting Patients with Favorable Risk, Grade Group 2 Prostate Cancer for Active Surveillance-Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Have a Role?
Stonier T; Tin AL; Sjoberg DD; Jibara G; Vickers AJ; Fine S; Eastham J
J Urol; 2021 Apr; 205(4):1063-1068. PubMed ID: 33216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does cumulative prostate cancer length (CCL) in prostate biopsies improve prediction of clinically insignificant cancer at radical prostatectomy in patients eligible for active surveillance?
Chen DJ; Falzarano SM; McKenney JK; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP; Roma A; Jones JS; Stephenson A; Klein E; Magi-Galluzzi C
BJU Int; 2015 Aug; 116(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 25060664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density to predict an upgrade in Gleason score between initial prostate biopsy and prostatectomy diminishes with increasing tumour grade due to reduced PSA secretion per unit tumour volume.
Corcoran NM; Casey RG; Hong MK; Pedersen J; Connolly S; Peters J; Harewood L; Gleave ME; Costello AJ; Hovens CM; Goldenberg SL
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 22085203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
