These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27746725)

  • 1. Monopolizing Sanctioning Power under Noise Eliminates Perverse Punishment But Does Not Increase Cooperation.
    Fischer S; Grechenig K; Meier N
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2016; 10():180. PubMed ID: 27746725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corruption drives the emergence of civil society.
    Abdallah S; Sayed R; Rahwan I; Leveck BL; Cebrian M; Rutherford A; Fowler JH
    J R Soc Interface; 2014 Apr; 11(93):20131044. PubMed ID: 24478283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Centralized sanctioning and legitimate authority promote cooperation in humans.
    Baldassarri D; Grossman G
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jul; 108(27):11023-7. PubMed ID: 21690401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Consensual punishment does not promote cooperation in the six-person prisoner's dilemma game with noisy public monitoring.
    van Miltenburg N; Przepiorka W; Buskens V
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188503. PubMed ID: 29176900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Promote or hinder? The role of punishment in the emergence of cooperation.
    Gao S; Wu T; Nie S; Wang L
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Dec; 386():69-77. PubMed ID: 26408337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The cost of noise: Stochastic punishment falls short of sustaining cooperation in social dilemma experiments.
    Salahshour M; Oberhauser V; Smerlak M
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(3):e0263028. PubMed ID: 35235586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can centralized sanctioning promote trust in social dilemmas? A two-level trust game with incomplete information.
    Wang RY; Ng CN
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0124513. PubMed ID: 25879752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sanctions as honest signals--the evolution of pool punishment by public sanctioning institutions.
    Schoenmakers S; Hilbe C; Blasius B; Traulsen A
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Sep; 356(100):36-46. PubMed ID: 24768866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Building the Leviathan--Voluntary centralisation of punishment power sustains cooperation in humans.
    Gross J; Méder ZZ; Okamoto-Barth S; Riedl A
    Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20767. PubMed ID: 26888519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Which is the ideal sanction for cooperation? An experimental study on different types of third-party sanctions.
    Hou G; Wang F; Shi J; Chen W; Yu J
    Psych J; 2019 Jun; 8(2):212-231. PubMed ID: 30592159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Punishment does not promote cooperation under exploration dynamics when anti-social punishment is possible.
    P Hauser O; A Nowak M; G Rand D
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Nov; 360():163-171. PubMed ID: 25014473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why Hate the Good Guy? Antisocial Punishment of High Cooperators Is Greater When People Compete To Be Chosen.
    Pleasant A; Barclay P
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jun; 29(6):868-876. PubMed ID: 29708860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The competitive advantage of institutional reward.
    Dong Y; Sasaki T; Zhang B
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 286(1899):20190001. PubMed ID: 30914009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stable polymorphism of cooperators and punishers in a public goods game.
    Oya G; Ohtsuki H
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Apr; 419():243-253. PubMed ID: 27880875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions.
    Gürerk O; Irlenbusch B; Rockenbach B
    Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5770):108-11. PubMed ID: 16601192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evolution of coordinated punishment to enforce cooperation from an unbiased strategy space.
    García J; Traulsen A
    J R Soc Interface; 2019 Jul; 16(156):20190127. PubMed ID: 31337305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of contemporaneous peer punishment on cooperation with the future.
    Lohse J; Waichman I
    Nat Commun; 2020 Apr; 11(1):1815. PubMed ID: 32286323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Competitions between prosocial exclusions and punishments in finite populations.
    Liu L; Chen X; Szolnoki A
    Sci Rep; 2017 Apr; 7():46634. PubMed ID: 28422168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The public goods game with shared punishment cost in well-mixed and structured populations.
    Wang X; Lv S
    J Theor Biol; 2019 Sep; 476():36-43. PubMed ID: 31150664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Group leaders establish cooperative norms that persist in subsequent interactions.
    Harrell A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222724. PubMed ID: 31536555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.