These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27746833)

  • 21. Hearing Aids Benefit Recognition of Words in Emotional Speech but Not Emotion Identification.
    Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Singh G; Russo FA
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518801736. PubMed ID: 30249171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effects of Nonlinear Frequency Compression and Digital Noise Reduction on Word Recognition and Satisfaction Ratings in Noise in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Tardy B; Hedrick M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Feb; 30(2):103-114. PubMed ID: 30461384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relative benefits of linear analogue and advanced digital hearing aids.
    Wood SA; Lutman ME
    Int J Audiol; 2004 Mar; 43(3):144-55. PubMed ID: 15198378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comprehensive hearing aid assessment in adults with bilateral severe-profound sensorineural hearing loss who present for Cochlear implant evaluation.
    Lupo JE; Biever A; Kelsall DC
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2020; 41(2):102300. PubMed ID: 31761407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perception of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Individuals with Late-Onset Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder.
    Mathai JP; Appu S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(10):815-23. PubMed ID: 26554487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Auditory Distraction and Acclimatization to Hearing Aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):174-183. PubMed ID: 27564230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of speech perception in background noise with acceptance of background noise in aided and unaided conditions.
    Nabelek AK; Tampas JW; Burchfield SB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Oct; 47(5):1001-11. PubMed ID: 15603458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss.
    Hillock-Dunn A; Buss E; Duncan N; Roush PA; Leibold LJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 24496288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on Mandarin speech and sound-quality perception in hearing-aid users.
    Chen X; You Y; Yang J; Qian J; Lu Q; Kuehnel V; Rehmann J; Liu B; Xu L
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jul; 59(7):524-533. PubMed ID: 32441563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms].
    Dörfler C; Hocke T; Hast A; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2020 Jan; 68(1):40-47. PubMed ID: 31728573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of a Bluetooth-implemented hearing aid on speech recognition performance: subjective and objective measurement.
    Kim MB; Chung WH; Choi J; Hong SH; Cho YS; Park G; Lee S
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Jun; 123(6):395-401. PubMed ID: 24687593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of Speech Recognition Skills in Different Noises with the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test in Hearing Aid Users.
    Çıldır B; Tokgöz-Yılmaz S
    Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jun; 59(2):133-138. PubMed ID: 34386800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effects of Extended Input Dynamic Range on Laboratory and Field-Trial Evaluations in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Easterday M; Behrens T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):634-648. PubMed ID: 30403956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Speech Perception and Information-Carrying Capacity for Hearing Aid Users of Different Ages.
    Hoppe U; Hocke T; Müller A; Hast A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21 Suppl 1():16-20. PubMed ID: 27806356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the Benefits of Bilateral Fitting in Bone-Anchored Hearing System Users: Spatial Resolution and Memory for Speech.
    Brassington W; Parker R; Bianchi F
    Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):530-543. PubMed ID: 36378104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The effects of wireless audio microphones on sentences recognition threshold for hearing aid users in noise].
    Chen J; Dong RJ; Liu DX; Wang Y; Wang S
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 33(10):951-953. PubMed ID: 31623041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the Bonebridge BCI 602 active bone conductive implant in adults: efficacy and stability of audiological, surgical, and functional outcomes.
    Cywka KB; Skarzynski PH; Krol B; Hatzopoulos S; Skarzynski H
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 279(7):3525-3534. PubMed ID: 35182185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Speech recognition with hearing aids for 10 standard audiograms : English version.
    Dörfler C; Hocke T; Hast A; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2020 Aug; 68(Suppl 2):93-99. PubMed ID: 32211930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology.
    Gravel JS; Fausel N; Liskow C; Chobot J
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 10037061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using Speech Recall in Hearing Aid Fitting and Outcome Evaluation Under Ecological Test Conditions.
    Lunner T; Rudner M; Rosenbom T; Ågren J; Ng EH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1():145S-54S. PubMed ID: 27355764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.