These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27746847)

  • 1. Bivariate Mixed Effects Analysis of Clustered Data with Large Cluster Sizes.
    Zhang D; Sun JL; Pieper K
    Stat Biosci; 2016 Oct; 8(2):220-233. PubMed ID: 27746847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in expectation maximization restricted maximum likelihood estimation of the linear mixed model.
    Matilainen K; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH; Strandén I; Thompson R
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Dec; 129(6):457-68. PubMed ID: 23148971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Employing a Monte Carlo algorithm in Newton-type methods for restricted maximum likelihood estimation of genetic parameters.
    Matilainen K; Mäntysaari EA; Lidauer MH; Strandén I; Thompson R
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e80821. PubMed ID: 24339886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stochastic Lanczos estimation of genomic variance components for linear mixed-effects models.
    Border R; Becker S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jul; 20(1):411. PubMed ID: 31362713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A zero-inflated Poisson mixed model to analyze diagnosis related groups with majority of same-day hospital stays.
    Wang K; Yau KK; Lee AH
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2002 Jun; 68(3):195-203. PubMed ID: 12074846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.
    Head SJ; Milojevic M; Daemen J; Ahn JM; Boersma E; Christiansen EH; Domanski MJ; Farkouh ME; Flather M; Fuster V; Hlatky MA; Holm NR; Hueb WA; Kamalesh M; Kim YH; Mäkikallio T; Mohr FW; Papageorgiou G; Park SJ; Rodriguez AE; Sabik JF; Stables RH; Stone GW; Serruys PW; Kappetein AP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(4):386-398. PubMed ID: 30025574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computationally Stable Estimation Procedure for the Multivariate Linear Mixed-Effect Model and Application to Malaria Public Health Problem.
    Adjakossa EH; Hounkonnou NM; Nuel G
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Jun; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 31226099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of the dominance merit in noninbred populations without recourse to its inverted relationship matrix.
    Chalh A; El Gazzah M
    J Appl Genet; 2003; 44(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 12590182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extended information criterion (EIC) approach for linear mixed effects models under restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation.
    Yafune A; Funatogawa T; Ishiguro M
    Stat Med; 2005 Nov; 24(22):3417-29. PubMed ID: 16237658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generalized Linear Mixed Models with Gaussian Mixture Random Effects: Inference and Application.
    Pan L; Li Y; He K; Li Y; Li Y
    J Multivar Anal; 2020 Jan; 175():. PubMed ID: 32063658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention following coronary artery bypass graft--a descriptive analysis of the changing interface between interventional cardiologist and cardiac surgeon.
    Adams MR; Orford JL; Blake GJ; Wainstein MV; Byrne JG; Selwyn AP
    Clin Cardiol; 2002 Jun; 25(6):280-6. PubMed ID: 12058791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inference for high-dimensional linear mixed-effects models: A quasi-likelihood approach.
    Li S; Cai TT; Li H
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2022; 117(540):1835-1846. PubMed ID: 36793369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention versus bypass surgery from a Dutch perspective.
    Osnabrugge RL; Magnuson EA; Serruys PW; Campos CM; Wang K; van Klaveren D; Farooq V; Abdallah MS; Li H; Vilain KA; Steyerberg EW; Morice MC; Dawkins KD; Mohr FW; Kappetein AP; Cohen DJ;
    Heart; 2015 Dec; 101(24):1980-8. PubMed ID: 26552756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Morrison DA; Sacks J
    Minerva Cardioangiol; 2003 Oct; 51(5):585-97. PubMed ID: 14551526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Average information residual maximum likelihood in practice.
    Gilmour AR
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jul; 136(4):262-272. PubMed ID: 31247685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. WOMBAT: a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML).
    Meyer K
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2007 Nov; 8(11):815-21. PubMed ID: 17973343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficient ReML inference in variance component mixed models using a Min-Max algorithm.
    Laporte F; Charcosset A; Mary-Huard T
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Jan; 18(1):e1009659. PubMed ID: 35073307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries versus bypass grafts in prior coronary artery bypass grafting patients: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.
    Brilakis ES; Rao SV; Banerjee S; Goldman S; Shunk KA; Holmes DR; Honeycutt E; Roe MT
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Aug; 4(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 21851896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcomes with percutaneous coronary revascularization vs coronary artery bypass grafting surgery in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis of 6 randomized trials and 4,686 patients.
    Palmerini T; Serruys P; Kappetein AP; Genereux P; Riva DD; Reggiani LB; Christiansen EH; Holm NR; Thuesen L; Makikallio T; Morice MC; Ahn JM; Park SJ; Thiele H; Boudriot E; Sabatino M; Romanello M; Biondi-Zoccai G; Cavalcante R; Sabik JF; Stone GW
    Am Heart J; 2017 Aug; 190():54-63. PubMed ID: 28760214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.