BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27747638)

  • 1. Occlusal status of implant superstructures at mandibular first molar immediately after setting.
    Okada Y; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Uchida K; Osawa T; Imamura Y; Terazawa M
    Int J Implant Dent; 2015 Dec; 1(1):16. PubMed ID: 27747638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of occlusal loading force on occlusal contacts in natural dentition.
    Imamura Y; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Uchida K; Osawa T; Omori M; Okada Y
    J Prosthodont Res; 2015 Apr; 59(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 25161117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of clenching intensity on bite force balance, occlusal contact area, and average bite pressure.
    Hidaka O; Iwasaki M; Saito M; Morimoto T
    J Dent Res; 1999 Jul; 78(7):1336-44. PubMed ID: 10403461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the thickness of silicone registration material as a means for occlusal contact examination--an explorative study with different tooth clenching intensities.
    Obara R; Komiyama O; Iida T; De Laat A; Kawara M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2013 Nov; 40(11):834-43. PubMed ID: 23889702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the occlusal contact area of individual teeth during low-level clenching.
    Nishimori H; Iida T; Kamiyama H; Komoda Y; Obara R; Uchida T; Kawara M; Komiyama O
    J Oral Sci; 2017 Sep; 59(3):337-342. PubMed ID: 28529279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distribution of occlusal forces during occlusal adjustment of dental implant prostheses: a nonlinear finite element analysis considering the capacity for displacement of opposing teeth and implants.
    Kasai K; Takayama Y; Yokoyama A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):329-35. PubMed ID: 22442771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of direct and indirect occlusal contact examinations with different clenching intensities.
    Komiyama O; Obara R; Iida T; Asano T; Masuda M; Uchida T; De Laat A; Kawara M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Mar; 42(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 25270097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relation between clenching strength and occlusal force distribution in primary dentition.
    Karibe H; Ogata K; Hasegawa Y; Ogihara K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 12588505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of clenching level on intercuspal contact area in various regions of the dental arch.
    Gurdsapsri W; Ai M; Baba K; Fueki K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Mar; 27(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 10784336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occlusal force distribution on the dental arch during various levels of clenching.
    Kumagai H; Suzuki T; Hamada T; Sondang P; Fujitani M; Nikawa H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Dec; 26(12):932-5. PubMed ID: 10620156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variation in Dental Occlusal Schemes Two Years After Placement of Single-Implant Posterior Crowns: A Preliminary Study.
    Prieto-Barrio P; Khoury-Ribas L; Rovira-Lastra B; Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Apr; 48(2):110-116. PubMed ID: 33710324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maximum clenching force of patients with moderate loss of posterior tooth support: a pilot study.
    Gibbs CH; Anusavice KJ; Young HM; Jones JS; Esquivel-Upshaw JF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):498-502. PubMed ID: 12473999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Initial Change in the Occlusal Force and Occlusal Contact Area Following Single Molar Implant Restoration.
    Kim YJ; Ko KH; Huh YH; Cho LR; Park CJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(6):1139-1146. PubMed ID: 34919612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An In Vivo Study on Load Distribution in Different Implant Configurations for Supporting Fixed Partial Dentures.
    Kobari H; Yoda N; Chen J; Kawata T; Sasaki K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1049-57. PubMed ID: 27632259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. EMG response to alteration of tooth contacts on occlusal splints during maximal clenching.
    Wood WW; Tobias DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Mar; 51(3):394-6. PubMed ID: 6584610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of stabilization splint on occlusal force distribution during voluntary submaximal tooth clenching: a preliminary sleep simulation study.
    Suganuma T; Itoh H; Ono Y; Baba K
    Cranio; 2013 Apr; 31(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 23795399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of occlusal height for an implant prosthesis on the periodontal tissues of the antagonist.
    Hoshino K; Miura H; Morikawa O; Kato H; Okada D; Shinki T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2004 Dec; 51(4):187-96. PubMed ID: 15704655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of different narrative instructions to record the occlusal contact with silicone registration materials.
    Obara R; Komiyama O; Iida T; Asano T; De Laat A; Kawara M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Mar; 41(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 24447195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the Alteration of Occlusal Distribution in Unilateral Free-End and Intermediate Missing Cases.
    Kon K; Shiota M; Sakuyama A; Ozeki M; Kozuma W; Kawakami S; Kasugai S
    J Oral Implantol; 2017 Feb; 43(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 28231040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of occlusal contact on the level of mandibular elevator muscle activity during maximal clenching in lateral positions.
    Shinogaya T; Kimura M; Matsumoto M
    J Med Dent Sci; 1997 Dec; 44(4):105-12. PubMed ID: 12160202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.