175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27747709)
1. Biomechanical effects of offset placement of dental implants in the edentulous posterior mandible.
Shimura Y; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Omori M
Int J Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 2(1):17. PubMed ID: 27747709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical investigation of mandibular molar implants: reproducibility and validity of a finite element analysis model.
Omori M; Sato Y; Kitagawa N; Shimura Y; Ito M
Int J Implant Dent; 2015 Dec; 1(1):10. PubMed ID: 27747632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Analysis of the effect of mesial implant position on surrounding bone stress of mandibular edentulous jaw under dynamic loads].
Li Y; Sun C; Jia H; Luo XJ
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Nov; 52(11):672-677. PubMed ID: 29972946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region.
Sato Y; Shindoi N; Hosokawa R; Tsuga K; Akagawa Y
J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Jan; 27(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 10632839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Offset Implant Placement on the Stress Distribution Around a Dental Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Siadat H; Hashemzadeh S; Geramy A; Bassir SH; Alikhasi M
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Dec; 41(6):646-51. PubMed ID: 24666333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stress analysis of implant-supported partial prostheses in anisotropic mandibular bone: in-line versus offset placements of implants.
Huang HL; Lin CL; Ko CC; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Huang JS
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Jul; 33(7):501-8. PubMed ID: 16774508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Titanium versus zirconia implants supporting maxillary overdentures: three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Osman RB; Elkhadem AH; Ma S; Swain MV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(5):e198-208. PubMed ID: 24066336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of fixed complete-arch prostheses supported by 4 immediate-loaded implants in the completely edentulous maxilla using clinical computerized tomography data.
Kimura K; Fukase Y; Makino M; Masaki C; Nakamoto T; Hosokawa R
J Oral Implantol; 2011 Mar; 37 Spec No():96-105. PubMed ID: 21495797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H
J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of implant framework and mandibular flexure on the strain distribution on a Kennedy class II mandible restored with a long-span implant fixed restoration: a pilot study.
Law C; Bennani V; Lyons K; Swain M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24388719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress and Strain Distribution Patterns in Bone around Splinted Standard and Short Implants Placed at the Crestal Level and Subcrestally using Three- Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Amid R; Rasoolzadeh RA; Motlagh AM; Dehnavi F; Kadkhodazadeh M
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2017; 27(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 29604944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone.
Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of splinted prosthesis supported a wide implant or two implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Huang HL; Huang JS; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chang CH; Chen MY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Aug; 16(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 16117772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element stress analysis of the influence of staggered versus straight placement of dental implants.
Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(5):722-30. PubMed ID: 11669255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Implant Position and Edentulous Span Length on Stresses Around Implants Assisting Claspless Distal Extension Partial Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
ELsyad MA; El Ghany Kabil AA; El Mekawy N
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Apr; 43(2):100-106. PubMed ID: 28048947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of Implant Positions and Occlusal Forces on Peri-Implant Bone Stress in Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Alvarez-Arenal A; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; deLlanos-Lanchares H; Brizuela-Velasco A; Martin-Fernandez E; Ellacuria-Echebarria J
J Oral Implantol; 2017 Dec; 43(6):419-428. PubMed ID: 28972823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bicortically stabilized implant load transfer.
Jeong CM; Caputo AA; Wylie RS; Son SC; Jeon YC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 12608670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical Influence of Edentulous Mandibular Morphology on Peri-implant Bone in Implant Prosthetics: Threedimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Hamada T; Gonda T; Murase K; Maeda Y; Ikebe K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Feb; 0(0):. PubMed ID: 38394439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Anterior Guidance a Key Factor on Planning Implant Treatment for Free-End Missing in the Posterior Mandible?
Nagao M; Masaki C; Nakao M; Ito Y; Tsuka S; Mukaibo T; Kondo Y; Hosokawa R
J Oral Implantol; 2019 Apr; 45(2):100-105. PubMed ID: 30540538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]