These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27747750)

  • 21. Improving the safety of distracted pedestrians with in-ground flashing lights. A railway crossing field study.
    Larue GS; Watling CN; Black A; Wood JM
    J Safety Res; 2021 Jun; 77():170-181. PubMed ID: 34092307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk.
    Stavrinos D; Byington KW; Schwebel DC
    Pediatrics; 2009 Feb; 123(2):e179-85. PubMed ID: 19171568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Harnessing Vehicle-to-Pedestrian (V2P) Communication Technology: Sending Traffic Warnings to Texting Pedestrians.
    Rahimian P; O'Neal EE; Zhou S; Plumert JM; Kearney JK
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):833-843. PubMed ID: 29920115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predicting the intention of distracted pedestrians at road crossings.
    O'Dell AL; Filtness AJ; Morris AP
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Aug; 173():106707. PubMed ID: 35594743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What's that on Your Phone? Effects of Mobile Device Task Type on Pedestrian Performance.
    Labonte-LeMoyne E; Cameron AF; Sénécal S; Fredette M; Faubert J; Lepore F; Léger PM
    Hum Factors; 2024 Apr; 66(4):1068-1080. PubMed ID: 36426775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effectiveness of interventions for mobile phone distracted pedestrians: A systematic review.
    Arafat ME; Larue GS; Dehkordi SG
    J Safety Res; 2023 Feb; 84():330-346. PubMed ID: 36868662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pedestrian self-reported use of smart phones: Positive attitudes and high exposure influence intentions to cross the road while distracted.
    Lennon A; Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Matthews S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan; 98():338-347. PubMed ID: 27825043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Risk perception and distraction engagement with smart devices in different types of walking environments.
    Zheng H; Giang WCW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106405. PubMed ID: 34598047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Pedestrian safety at roundabouts: Their crossing and glance behavior in the interaction with vehicular traffic.
    Gruden C; Ištoka Otković I; Šraml M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106290. PubMed ID: 34246056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Social Force Model-Based Safety Evaluation of Intersections in Arterials Considering the Pedestrian Yield Rule.
    Yao J; Li Y; He J
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Nov; 18(23):. PubMed ID: 34886182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effects of mobile phone use on pedestrian crossing behaviour at signalized and unsignalized intersections.
    Hatfield J; Murphy S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2007 Jan; 39(1):197-205. PubMed ID: 16919588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Pedestrian crossing behavior, an observational study in the city of Ushuaia, Argentina.
    Poó FM; Ledesma RD; Trujillo R
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):305-310. PubMed ID: 29053374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pedestrians distracted by their smartphone: Are in-ground flashing lights catching their attention? A laboratory study.
    Larue GS; Watling CN; Black AA; Wood JM; Khakzar M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jan; 134():105346. PubMed ID: 31710957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of risk perception and other psychological factors on mobile phone use while crossing the street among pedestrians.
    Hou M; Chen S; Cheng J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 170():106643. PubMed ID: 35358756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Plight of the distracted pedestrian: a research synthesis and meta-analysis of mobile phone use on crossing behaviour.
    Simmons SM; Caird JK; Ta A; Sterzer F; Hagel BE
    Inj Prev; 2020 Apr; 26(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 32015086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of mobile Internet use on college student pedestrian injury risk.
    Byington KW; Schwebel DC
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():78-83. PubMed ID: 23201755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Major urban road characteristics and injured pedestrians: A representative survey of intersections in Montréal, Quebec.
    Morency P; Archambault J; Cloutier MS; Tremblay M; Plante C
    Can J Public Health; 2015 Oct; 106(6):e388-94. PubMed ID: 26680430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Prevalence of distracted walking with mobile technology: an observational study of Calgary and Edmonton high school students.
    Quon P; Lahey K; Grisdale M; Hagel B; Frost G; Belton K; Elliott A
    Can J Public Health; 2019 Aug; 110(4):506-511. PubMed ID: 30887456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distracted Behavior of Pedestrians While Crossing Street: A Case Study in China.
    Hou M; Cheng J; Xiao F; Wang C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33466495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Effects of Cell Phone and Text Message Conversations on Simulated Street Crossing.
    Banducci SE; Ward N; Gaspar JG; Schab KR; Crowell JA; Kaczmarski H; Kramer AF
    Hum Factors; 2016 Feb; 58(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 26490442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.