These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27748950)

  • 1. Environmental change mediates mate choice for an extended phenotype, but not for mate quality.
    Head ML; Fox RJ; Barber I
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 27748950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Female stickleback prefer shallow males: Sexual selection on nest microhabitat.
    Bolnick DI; Shim KC; Brock CD
    Evolution; 2015 Jun; 69(6):1643-1653. PubMed ID: 25958935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Females sample more males at high nesting densities, but ultimately obtain less attractive mates.
    Tinghitella RM; Stehle C; Boughman JW
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 15():200. PubMed ID: 26385337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Within-generation and transgenerational plasticity of mate choice in oceanic stickleback under climate change.
    Fuxjäger L; Wanzenböck S; Ringler E; Wegner KM; Ahnelt H; Shama LNS
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180183. PubMed ID: 30966960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Male and female preferences for nest characteristics under paternal care.
    Pärssinen V; Kalb N; Vallon M; Anthes N; Heubel K
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jul; 9(13):7780-7791. PubMed ID: 31346440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.
    Bay RA; Arnegard ME; Conte GL; Best J; Bedford NL; McCann SR; Dubin ME; Chan YF; Jones FC; Kingsley DM; Schluter D; Peichel CL
    Curr Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(21):3344-3349.e4. PubMed ID: 29056455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Male mate choice relies on major histocompatibility complex class I in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.
    Roth O; Sundin J; Berglund A; Rosenqvist G; Wegner KM
    J Evol Biol; 2014 May; 27(5):929-38. PubMed ID: 24725009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sequential mate choice and sexual isolation in threespine stickleback species.
    Kozak GM; Head ML; Lackey AC; Boughman JW
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 23194003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term environmental stability does not erode plasticity in nest building responses to changing ambient conditions.
    Chung MJ; Barber I; Head ML
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Aug; 378(1884):20220154. PubMed ID: 37427465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing for mating isolation between ecotypes: laboratory experiments with lake, stream and hybrid stickleback.
    Raeymaekers JA; Boisjoly M; Delaire L; Berner D; Räsänen K; Hendry AP
    J Evol Biol; 2010 Dec; 23(12):2694-708. PubMed ID: 20939859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonlinear effects of female mate choice in wild threespine sticklebacks.
    Blais J; Rico C; Bernatchez L
    Evolution; 2004 Nov; 58(11):2498-510. PubMed ID: 15612293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
    Conte GL; Schluter D
    Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The social and ecological costs of an 'over-extended' phenotype.
    Jordan LA; Maguire SM; Hofmann HA; Kohda M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2016 Jan; 283(1822):. PubMed ID: 26740619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How sexual and natural selection interact and shape the evolution of nests and nesting behaviour in fishes.
    Svensson O; Kvarnemo C
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2023 Aug; 378(1884):20220139. PubMed ID: 37427477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for sex-specific selection in brain: a case study of the nine-spined stickleback.
    Herczeg G; Välimäki K; Gonda A; Merilä J
    J Evol Biol; 2014 Aug; 27(8):1604-12. PubMed ID: 24898271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The influence of oxygen stress on female choice for male nest structure in the common goby.
    Jones JC; Reynolds JD
    Anim Behav; 1999 Jan; 57(1):189-196. PubMed ID: 10053086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of the iridescent eye in stickleback female mate choice.
    Flamarique IN; Bergstrom C; Cheng CL; Reimchen TE
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Aug; 216(Pt 15):2806-12. PubMed ID: 23580716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An increase in pH boosts olfactory communication in sticklebacks.
    Heuschele J; Candolin U
    Biol Lett; 2007 Aug; 3(4):411-3. PubMed ID: 17456448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual selection is influenced by both developmental and adult environments.
    Gillespie SR; Scarlett Tudor M; Moore AJ; Miller CW
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3421-32. PubMed ID: 25226860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.