BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27749475)

  • 1. Adoption of Robotic Technology for Treating Colorectal Cancer.
    Schootman M; Hendren S; Ratnapradipa K; Stringer L; Davidson NO
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Nov; 59(11):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 27749475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
    Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Hanna MH; Carmichael JC; Pigazzi A; Stamos MJ; Mills S
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jul; 30(7):2792-8. PubMed ID: 26487196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Effect of Formal Robotic Residency Training on the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery by Young Colorectal Surgeons.
    Disbrow DE; Pannell SM; Shanker BA; Albright J; Wu J; Bastawrous A; Soliman M; Ferraro J; Cleary RK
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):767-778. PubMed ID: 29054345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Safety and efficacy of synchronous robotic surgery for colorectal cancer with liver metastases.
    Dwyer RH; Scheidt MJ; Marshall JS; Tsoraides SS
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Dec; 12(4):603-606. PubMed ID: 29704203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
    Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes Between Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Cancer.
    Zhu XL; Yan PJ; Yao L; Liu R; Wu DW; Du BB; Yang KH; Guo TK; Yang XF
    Surg Innov; 2019 Feb; 26(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 30191755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of trends in operative approach and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer surgery.
    Addae JK; Gani F; Fang SY; Wick EC; Althumairi AA; Efron JE; Canner JK; Euhus DM; Schneider EB
    J Surg Res; 2017 Feb; 208():111-120. PubMed ID: 27993198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery.
    Tam MS; Kaoutzanis C; Mullard AJ; Regenbogen SE; Franz MG; Hendren S; Krapohl G; Vandewarker JF; Lampman RM; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):455-463. PubMed ID: 25894448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of complication and conversion rates between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic rectal resection for rectal cancer: which patients and providers could benefit most from robotic-assisted surgery?
    Ackerman SJ; Daniel S; Baik R; Liu E; Mehendale S; Tackett S; Hellan M
    J Med Econ; 2018 Mar; 21(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 29065737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: towards defining criteria to the right choice.
    Zelhart M; Kaiser AM
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 28812154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
    Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Abdominoperineal Resections in Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z; Phelan M; Smith BR; Stamos MJ
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Dec; 58(12):1123-9. PubMed ID: 26544808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Right Colon Resection for Colon Cancer: Does Surgical Approach Matter?
    Haskins IN; Ju T; Skancke M; Kuang X; Amdur RL; Brody F; Obias V; Agarwal S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Oct; 28(10):1202-1206. PubMed ID: 29775552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in the United States: a nationwide analysis of trends and outcomes.
    Halabi WJ; Kang CY; Jafari MD; Nguyen VQ; Carmichael JC; Mills S; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
    World J Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(12):2782-90. PubMed ID: 23564216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Results of video-assisted technologies in colorectal surgery].
    Shevchenko YL; Karpov OE; Vetshev PS; Maksimenkov AV; Stepanyuk IV; Stoyko YM; Levchuk AL; Nazarov VA; Kolozyan DA
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2018; (2):66-73. PubMed ID: 29460882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding the Value of Both Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches Compared to the Open Approach in Colorectal Surgery.
    Hollis RH; Cannon JA; Singletary BA; Korb ML; Hawn MT; Heslin MJ
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2016 Nov; 26(11):850-856. PubMed ID: 27398733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.
    Tyler JA; Fox JP; Desai MM; Perry WB; Glasgow SC
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 23478613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Security and Radical Assessment in Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Comparative Study.
    Yang SX; Sun ZQ; Zhou QB; Xu JZ; Chang Y; Xia KK; Wang GX; Li Z; Song JM; Zhang ZY; Yuan WT; Liu JB
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Jan; 17():1533033818794160. PubMed ID: 30198395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive colorectal surgery: status and technical specifications.
    Keller DS; Ibarra S; Haas EM
    Minerva Chir; 2015 Oct; 70(5):373-80. PubMed ID: 26149521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.