158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27749519)
1. Influence of Implant Shape (Tapered vs Cylindrical) on the Survival of Dental Implants Placed in the Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review.
Alshehri M; Alshehri F
Implant Dent; 2016 Dec; 25(6):855-860. PubMed ID: 27749519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Role of implant diameter on long-term survival of dental implants placed in posterior maxilla: a systematic review.
Javed F; Romanos GE
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jan; 19(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 25366871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review.
Wallace SS; Froum SJ
Ann Periodontol; 2003 Dec; 8(1):328-43. PubMed ID: 14971260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Partial Rehabilitation with Distally Tilted and Straight Implants in the Posterior Maxilla with Immediate Loading Protocol: A Retrospective Cohort Study with 5-Year Follow-up.
Queridinha BM; Almeida RF; Felino A; de Araújo Nobre M; Maló P
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):891-9. PubMed ID: 27447158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized controlled clinical trial of two types of tapered implants on immediate loading in the posterior maxilla and mandible.
Kim YK; Lee JH; Lee JY; Yi YJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1602-11. PubMed ID: 24278929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonremoval of immediate abutments in cases involving subcrestally placed postextractive tapered single implants: a randomized controlled clinical study.
Degidi M; Nardi D; Daprile G; Piattelli A
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Dec; 16(6):794-805. PubMed ID: 23458566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants.
Ormianer Z; Piek D; Livne S; Lavi D; Zafrir G; Palti A; Harel N
Implant Dent; 2012 Aug; 21(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 22814562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study.
Barone A; Orlando B; Tonelli P; Covani U
J Periodontol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 20831372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth?
Romanos GE; Javed F
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 24860981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading.
Nordin T; Nilsson R; Frykholm A; Hallman M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):880-6. PubMed ID: 15623065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Immediate/Early function of Neoss implants placed in maxillas and posterior mandibles: an 18-month prospective case series study.
Bogaerde LV; Pedretti G; Sennerby L; Meredith N
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e83-94. PubMed ID: 19076176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing.
Waechter J; Madruga MM; Carmo Filho LCD; Leite FRM; Schinestsck AR; Faot F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 19(4):733-741. PubMed ID: 28557376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of primary stability of self-tapping and non-self-tapping dental implants. A 12-week clinical study.
Marković A; Calvo-Guirado JL; Lazić Z; Gómez-Moreno G; Ćalasan D; Guardia J; Čolic S; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Gačić B; Delgado-Ruiz R; Janjić B; Mišić T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 22171668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Survival of Implants Using the Osteotome Technique With or Without Grafting in the Posterior Maxilla: A Systematic Review.
Shi JY; Gu YX; Zhuang LF; Lai HC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1077-88. PubMed ID: 27632263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Systematic Review of the Role of Implant Design in the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla.
Jokstad A; Sanz M; Ogawa T; Bassi F; Levin L; Wennerberg A; Romanos GE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31 Suppl():s43-99. PubMed ID: 27228254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Secondarily stabilized dental implants: an alternative to sinus grafting--early clinical results of 63 consecutively placed implants.
Laster Z; Jensen OT
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2136-9. PubMed ID: 18848114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival of dental implants in native and grafted bone in irradiated head and neck cancer patients: a retrospective analysis.
Buddula A; Assad DA; Salinas TJ; Garces YI
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 22406706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla with pterygoid implants: a review.
Candel E; Peñarrocha D; Peñarrocha M
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Sep; 38 Spec No():461-6. PubMed ID: 21568718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
