BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27749980)

  • 1. Strong cryptic prezygotic isolation despite lack of behavioral isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae.
    Soudi S; Reinhold K; Engqvist L
    Evolution; 2016 Dec; 70(12):2889-2898. PubMed ID: 27749980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ecologically dependent and intrinsic genetic signatures of postzygotic isolation between sympatric host races of the leaf beetle Lochmaea capreae.
    Soudi S; Reinhold K; Engqvist L
    Evolution; 2016 Feb; 70(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 26882317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic architecture underlying host choice differentiation in the sympatric host races of Lochmaea capreae leaf beetles.
    Soudi S; Reinhold K; Engqvist L
    Genetica; 2016 Apr; 144(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 26857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of prezygotic isolation mechanisms in the divergence of two parasite species.
    Henrich T; Kalbe M
    BMC Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):245. PubMed ID: 27829374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of heterospecific mating frequency on the strength of cryptic reproductive barriers.
    Larson EL; Brassil MM; Maslan J; Juárez D; Lilagan F; Tipton H; Schweitzer A; Skillman J; Monsen-Collar KJ; Peterson MA
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Sep; 32(9):900-912. PubMed ID: 31162735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strong asymmetry in the relative strengths of prezygotic and postzygotic barriers between two damselfly sister species.
    Sánchez-Guillén RA; Wellenreuther M; Cordero Rivera A
    Evolution; 2012 Mar; 66(3):690-707. PubMed ID: 22380433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phenotypic plasticity of mate recognition systems prevents sexual interference between two sympatric leaf beetle species.
    Otte T; Hilker M; Geiselhardt S
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1819-28. PubMed ID: 27272669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Asymmetrical sexual isolation but no postmating isolation between the closely related species Drosophila suboccidentalis and Drosophila occidentalis.
    Arthur NJ; Dyer KA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2015 Mar; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25881167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength of sexual and postmating prezygotic barriers varies between sympatric populations with different histories and species abundances.
    Poikela N; Kinnunen J; Wurdack M; Kauranen H; Schmitt T; Kankare M; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2019 Jun; 73(6):1182-1199. PubMed ID: 30957216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Post-mating prezygotic barriers to gene exchange between hybridizing field crickets.
    Larson EL; Hume GL; Andrés JA; Harrison RG
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Jan; 25(1):174-86. PubMed ID: 22092687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproductive isolation among allopatric Drosophila montana populations.
    Jennings JH; Snook RR; Hoikkala A
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3095-108. PubMed ID: 25302639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Host races in plant-feeding insects and their importance in sympatric speciation.
    Drès M; Mallet J
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2002 Apr; 357(1420):471-92. PubMed ID: 12028786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sympatric reinforcement of reproductive barriers between Neotinea tridentata and N. ustulata (Orchidaceae).
    Pellegrino G
    J Plant Res; 2016 Nov; 129(6):1061-1068. PubMed ID: 27502952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Geographic contrasts between pre- and postzygotic barriers are consistent with reinforcement in Heliconius butterflies.
    Rosser N; Queste LM; Cama B; Edelman NB; Mann F; Mori Pezo R; Morris J; Segami C; Velado P; Schulz S; Mallet JLB; Dasmahapatra KK
    Evolution; 2019 Sep; 73(9):1821-1838. PubMed ID: 31334832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cryptic reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans species complex.
    Price CS; Kim CH; Gronlund CJ; Coyne JA
    Evolution; 2001 Jan; 55(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 11263748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sympatric Speciation in the Genomic Era.
    Foote AD
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 33(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 29198471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restricted gene flow within and between rapidly diverging Neotropical plant species.
    Surget-Groba Y; Kay KM
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Oct; 22(19):4931-42. PubMed ID: 23952304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reinforcement shapes clines in female mate discrimination in Drosophila subquinaria.
    Bewick ER; Dyer KA
    Evolution; 2014 Nov; 68(11):3082-94. PubMed ID: 25163510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexual imprinting and speciation between two Peromyscus species.
    Delaney EK; Hoekstra HE
    Evolution; 2018 Feb; 72(2):274-287. PubMed ID: 29231989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.