These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27750326)

  • 1. Recommendations for the Conduct and Reporting of Modeling and Simulation Studies in Health Technology Assessment.
    Dahabreh IJ; Trikalinos TA; Balk EM; Wong JB
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 165(8):575-581. PubMed ID: 27750326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
    Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Presentational approaches used in the UK for reporting evidence synthesis using indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.
    Tan SH; Bujkiewicz S; Sutton A; Dequen P; Cooper N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2013 Oct; 18(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 23945680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are human readers needed for prognostication from stress myocardial perfusion SPECT? Using outcomes research to validate medical technology.
    Hachamovitch R; Di Carli MF
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Feb; 46(2):194-7. PubMed ID: 15695774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: an inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment.
    Watt A; Cameron A; Sturm L; Lathlean T; Babidge W; Blamey S; Facey K; Hailey D; Norderhaug I; Maddern G
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 18400114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using health technology assessment to identify gaps in evidence and inform study design for comparative effectiveness research.
    Tunis SR; Turkelson C
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4256-61. PubMed ID: 23071248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Part 2. Development of Enhanced Statistical Methods for Assessing Health Effects Associated with an Unknown Number of Major Sources of Multiple Air Pollutants.
    Park ES; Symanski E; Han D; Spiegelman C
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2015 Jun; (183 Pt 1-2):51-113. PubMed ID: 26333239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Not Available].
    Giulio Formoso, per l'Associazione Alessandro Liberati - Network italiano Cochrane
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):524-525. PubMed ID: 31808432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Briscoe S
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Apr; 8():153. PubMed ID: 25889619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Modeling good research practices--overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1.
    Caro JJ; Briggs AH; Siebert U; Kuntz KM;
    Med Decis Making; 2012; 32(5):667-77. PubMed ID: 22990082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Systematic searching and selection of health state utility values from the literature.
    Papaioannou D; Brazier J; Paisley S
    Value Health; 2013 Jun; 16(4):686-95. PubMed ID: 23796303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
    Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption.
    Kiefer C; Sturtz S; Bender R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 32093605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation and calibration of structural models that combine information from multiple sources.
    Dahabreh IJ; Wong JB; Trikalinos TA
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2017 Feb; 17(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 28043174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multi-criteria development and incorporation into decision tools for health technology adoption.
    Poulin P; Austen L; Scott CM; Waddell CD; Dixon E; Poulin M; Lafrenière R
    J Health Organ Manag; 2013; 27(2):246-65. PubMed ID: 23802401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.