139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27751191)
1. USING THE AMSTAR CHECKLIST FOR RAPID REVIEWS: IS IT FEASIBLE?
Mattivi JT; Buchberger B
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 27751191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological quality assessment of paper-based systematic reviews published in oral health.
Wasiak J; Shen AY; Tan HB; Mahar R; Kan G; Khoo WR; Faggion CM
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):399-431. PubMed ID: 26589200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available for bovine and equine veterinarians and quality of abstract reporting: A scoping review.
Buczinski S; Ferraro S; Vandeweerd JM
Prev Vet Med; 2018 Dec; 161():50-59. PubMed ID: 30466658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on influenza vaccination.
Remschmidt C; Wichmann O; Harder T
Vaccine; 2014 Mar; 32(15):1678-84. PubMed ID: 24513008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in assisted reproductive technologies.
Windsor B; Popovich I; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar C
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3460-6. PubMed ID: 23034152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quality of conduct and reporting in rapid reviews: an exploration of compliance with PRISMA and AMSTAR guidelines.
Kelly SE; Moher D; Clifford TJ
Syst Rev; 2016 May; 5():79. PubMed ID: 27160255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How is AMSTAR applied by authors - a call for better reporting.
Pieper D; Koensgen N; Breuing J; Ge L; Wegewitz U
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jun; 18(1):56. PubMed ID: 29914386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on periodontal regeneration in humans.
Elangovan S; Avila-Ortiz G; Johnson GK; Karimbux N; Allareddy V
J Periodontol; 2013 Feb; 84(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 22509753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality of conduct and reporting of meta-analyses of surgical interventions.
Adie S; Ma D; Harris IA; Naylor JM; Craig JC
Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):685-94. PubMed ID: 25575252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Systematic reviews explained: AMSTAR-how to tell the good from the bad and the ugly.
Sharif MO; Janjua-Sharif FN; Ali H; Ahmed F
Oral Health Dent Manag; 2013 Mar; 12(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 23474576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. PRISMA and AMSTAR show systematic reviews on health literacy and cancer screening are of good quality.
Sharma S; Oremus M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 Jul; 99():123-131. PubMed ID: 29654821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy.
Moseley AM; Elkins MR; Herbert RD; Maher CG; Sherrington C
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 62(10):1021-30. PubMed ID: 19282144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on short dental implants.
Elangovan S; Mawardi HH; Karimbux NY
J Periodontol; 2013 Jun; 84(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 22873652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.
Shi C; Zhu L; Wang X; Qin C; Xu Q; Tian J
Int J Nurs Pract; 2014 Dec; 20(6):689-700. PubMed ID: 25532885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental Students' Use of AMSTAR to Critically Appraise Systematic Reviews.
Teich ST; Heima M; Lang L
J Dent Educ; 2015 Sep; 79(9):1031-9. PubMed ID: 26329027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-analyses and Systematic Reviews of the Relationship Between Periodontal and Systemic Diseases.
Natto ZS; Hameedaldain A
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2019 Jun; 19(2):131-139. PubMed ID: 31326045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A flood tide of systematic reviews on endodontic posts: methodological assessment using of R-AMSTAR.
Schmitter M; Sterzenbach G; Faggion CM; Krastl G
Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jun; 17(5):1287-94. PubMed ID: 23436119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methodological quality of systematic reviews in subfertility: a comparison of two different approaches.
Popovich I; Windsor B; Jordan V; Showell M; Shea B; Farquhar CM
PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e50403. PubMed ID: 23300526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
