These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27752709)

  • 1. Skeletal effects in Angle Class II/1 patients treated with the functional regulator type II : Cephalometric and tensor analysis.
    Schulz S; Koos B; Duske K; Stahl F
    J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Nov; 77(6):420-431. PubMed ID: 27752709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An esthetic treatment outcome of orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in class II treatment: a cephalometric study.
    Kabbur KJ; Hemanth M; Patil GS; Sathyadeep V; Shamnur N; Harieesha KB; Praveen GR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Sep; 13(5):602-6. PubMed ID: 23250160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II correction with the Cantilever Bite Jumper.
    Moro A; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Petrelli NE; Lauris JP
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):221-9. PubMed ID: 19216611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An assessment of late fixed functional treatment and the stability of Forsus appliance effects.
    Gao W; Li X; Bai Y
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 May; 30(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 24968640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal Class II treatment with Twin Force Bite Corrector: case reports.
    Altuğ-Ataç AT; Dalcı ÖN; Memikoğlu UT
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):e7-17. PubMed ID: 19641763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term mandibular skeletal and dental effects of standard edgewise treatment.
    Bayirli B; Vaden JL; Johnston LE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Nov; 144(5):682-90. PubMed ID: 24182584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliances.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Shetty VS; Mogra S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):712-20. PubMed ID: 21436189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R; Martin CA; Dischinger T; Razmus T; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Treatment using the Lehman apparatus in patients with malocclusion in light of teleradiologic tests and dental arch measurements].
    Bielawska H
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2002; 48():195-212. PubMed ID: 14601478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance].
    Lai W; Lu S; Huang N; Zhao M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
    Alves PF; Oliveira AG
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cephalometric evaluation of pretreatment and post-treatment outcome using Tetragon analysis: a retrospective study.
    Bhasin VS; Tammannavar P; Pushpalatha C; Nayak SS; Viswanathan V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):238-43. PubMed ID: 23811652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.