These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27752832)
1. Suspicious breast calcifications undergoing stereotactic biopsy in women ages 70 and over: Breast cancer incidence by BI-RADS descriptors. Grimm LJ; Johnson DY; Johnson KS; Baker JA; Soo MS; Hwang ES; Ghate SV Eur Radiol; 2017 Jun; 27(6):2275-2281. PubMed ID: 27752832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score. Woodard GA; Price ER AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simplifying Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification of mammograms with pure suspicious calcifications. Menezes GL; Winter-Warnars GA; Koekenbier EL; Groen EJ; Verkooijen HM; Pijnappel RM J Med Screen; 2018 Jun; 25(2):82-87. PubMed ID: 28691862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Fajardo LL; Pisano ED; Caudry DJ; Gatsonis CA; Berg WA; Connolly J; Schnitt S; Page DL; McNeil BJ; Acad Radiol; 2004 Mar; 11(3):293-308. PubMed ID: 15035520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical biopsy is still necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy. Jeffries DO; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Joe AI; Pinsky RW; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Dec; 154(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 26589316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of the Kaiser score on clinical decision-making in BI-RADS 4 mammographic calcifications examined with breast MRI. Wengert GJ; Pipan F; Almohanna J; Bickel H; Polanec S; Kapetas P; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT Eur Radiol; 2020 Mar; 30(3):1451-1459. PubMed ID: 31797077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Malignancy rates of stereotactic biopsies of two or more distinct sites of suspicious calcifications in women without known breast cancer. Chang Sen LQ; Huang ML; Leung JWT; Wei W; Adrada BE Clin Imaging; 2019; 58():156-160. PubMed ID: 31376706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications. Rominger M; Wisgickl C; Timmesfeld N Rofo; 2012 Dec; 184(12):1144-52. PubMed ID: 22923222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology]. Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A matrix of morphology and distribution of calcifications in the breast: Analysis of 849 vacuum-assisted biopsies. Kaltenbach B; Brandenbusch V; Möbus V; Mall G; Falk S; van den Bergh M; Chevalier F; Müller-Schimpfle M Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():221-226. PubMed ID: 28027751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-reader Variability in the Use of BI-RADS Descriptors for Suspicious Findings on Diagnostic Mammography: A Multi-institution Study of 10 Academic Radiologists. Lee AY; Wisner DJ; Aminololama-Shakeri S; Arasu VA; Feig SA; Hargreaves J; Ojeda-Fournier H; Bassett LW; Wells CJ; De Guzman J; Flowers CI; Campbell JE; Elson SL; Retallack H; Joe BN Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):60-66. PubMed ID: 27793579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long term clinical follow-up of atypical ductal hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ in breast core needle biopsies. Renshaw AA; Gould EW Pathology; 2016 Jan; 48(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 27020205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mixed-Methods Study to Predict Upstaging of DCIS to Invasive Disease on Mammography. Grimm LJ; Neely B; Hou R; Selvakumaran V; Baker JA; Yoon SC; Ghate SV; Walsh R; Litton TP; Devalapalli A; Kim C; Soo MS; Hyslop T; Hwang ES; Lo JY AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):903-911. PubMed ID: 32783550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The role of stereotactic 11G vacuum biopsy for clarification of BI-RADS IV findings in mammography]. Diebold T; Jacobi V; Krapfl E; von Minckwitz G; Solbach C; Ballenberger S; Hochmuth K; Balzer JO; Fellbaum M; Kaufmann M; Vogl TJ Rofo; 2003 Apr; 175(4):489-94. PubMed ID: 12677503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is stereotactic large-core needle biopsy beneficial prior to surgical treatment in BI-RADS 5 lesions? Hoorntje LE; Peeters PH; Mali WP; Borel Rinkes IH Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2004 Jul; 86(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 15319568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictive values of BI-RADS(®) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Badan GM; Piato S; Roveda D; de Faria Castro Fleury E Eur J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 85(10):1701-1707. PubMed ID: 27666605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radial scars diagnosed on breast core biopsy: Frequency of atypia and carcinoma on excision and implications for management. Donaldson AR; Sieck L; Booth CN; Calhoun BC Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():201-207. PubMed ID: 27371970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]