BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27753111)

  • 1. Sonohysterosalpingography: Comparison of foam and saline solution.
    Piccioni MG; Riganelli L; Filippi V; Fuggetta E; Colagiovanni V; Imperiale L; Caccetta J; Panici PB; Porpora MG
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Feb; 45(2):67-71. PubMed ID: 27753111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography in comparison to hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with air/saline and to laparoscopy with dye.
    Ludwin I; Ludwin A; Wiechec M; Nocun A; Banas T; Basta P; Pitynski K
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):758-769. PubMed ID: 28184447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hysterosalpingo-contrast-sonography (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency in endometriosis patients.
    Moro F; Tropea A; Selvaggi L; Scarinci E; Lanzone A; Apa R
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Mar; 186():22-5. PubMed ID: 25597884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) and hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with saline medium (HyCoSy) in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Lim SL; Jung JJ; Yu SL; Rajesh H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Dec; 195():168-172. PubMed ID: 26547487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feasibility, tolerability, and safety of hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (hyfosy). multicenter, prospective Spanish study.
    Engels V; Medina M; Antolín E; Ros C; Amaro A; De-Guirior C; Manzour N; Sotillo L; De la Cuesta R; Rodríguez R; San-Frutos L; Peralta S; Martin-Martínez A; Alcázar JL
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 May; 50(5):102004. PubMed ID: 33242678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy) a cost-effective alternative for hysterosalpingography (HSG) in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    van Rijswijk J; van Welie N; Dreyer K; van Hooff MHA; de Bruin JP; Verhoeve HR; Mol F; Kleiman-Broeze KA; Traas MAF; Muijsers GJJM; Manger AP; Gianotten J; de Koning CH; Koning AMH; Bayram N; van der Ham DP; Vrouenraets FPJM; Kalafusova M; van de Laar BIG; Kaijser J; van Oostwaard MF; Meijer WJ; Broekmans FJM; Valkenburg O; van der Voet LF; van Disseldorp J; Lambers MJ; Peters HE; Lier MCI; Lambalk CB; van Wely M; Bossuyt PMM; Stoker J; van der Veen F; Mol BWJ; Mijatovic V
    BMC Womens Health; 2018 May; 18(1):64. PubMed ID: 29743106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Sonohysterosalpingography versus hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of uterine and tubal infertility].
    Socolov D; Lupaşcu IA; Danciu E; Doroftei B; Boian I; Boiculese L; Pintilie P; Miron N
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2009; 113(3):803-8. PubMed ID: 20191836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C; Pizzo A; Lazzeri L; Pietropolli A; Piccione E; Zupi E
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography, a less painful procedure for tubal patency testing during fertility workup compared with (serial) hysterosalpingography: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dreyer K; Out R; Hompes PG; Mijatovic V
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Sep; 102(3):821-5. PubMed ID: 24996498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast ultrasonography for tubal patency.
    Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Luciano AA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):994-8. PubMed ID: 24910933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic value of transvaginal four-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography combined with recanalization in patients with tubal infertility.
    Gao YB; Yan JH; Yang YD; Sun J; Dong JY; Cui GH
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Jan; 22(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 30666019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of Fallopian tube patency by HyCoSy: comparison of a positive contrast agent with saline solution.
    Boudghène FP; Bazot M; Robert Y; Perrot N; Rocourt N; Antoine JM; Morris H; Leroy JL; Uzan S; Bigot JM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Nov; 18(5):525-30. PubMed ID: 11844177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography replace hysterosalpingography in confirming tubal blockage after hysteroscopic sterilization and in the evaluation of the uterus and tubes in infertile patients?
    Luciano DE; Exacoustos C; Johns DA; Luciano AA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jan; 204(1):79.e1-5. PubMed ID: 21187197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography compared with hysterosalpingography and laparoscopic dye pertubation to evaluate tubal patency.
    Exacoustos C; Zupi E; Carusotti C; Lanzi G; Marconi D; Arduini D
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2003 Aug; 10(3):367-72. PubMed ID: 14567814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-step transvaginal three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (3D-HyFoSy) confirmation test for Essure® follow-up: a multicenter study.
    Zizolfi B; Lazzeri L; Franchini M; Di Spiezio Sardo A; Nappi C; Piccione E; Exacoustos C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 28067009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The assessment of endometrial pathology and tubal patency: a comparison between the use of ultrasonography and X-ray hysterosalpingography for the investigation of infertility patients.
    Strandell A; Bourne T; Bergh C; Granberg S; Asztely M; Thorburn J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Sep; 14(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 10550881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography versus radiographic hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Hamed HO; Shahin AY; Elsamman AM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 105(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 19339010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of a new gel foam for the evaluation of tubal patency.
    Van Schoubroeck D; Van den Bosch T; Meuleman C; Tomassetti C; D'Hooghe T; Timmerman D
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2013; 75(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 23296258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo-Contrast-Sonography for the Assessment of Tubal Patency in Women with Infertility: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
    Alcázar JL; Martinez-Astorquiza Corral T; Orozco R; Dominguez-Piriz J; Juez L; Errasti T
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2016; 81(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 26824833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of three-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography with SonoVue in the assessment of tubal patency.
    Zhou L; Zhang X; Chen X; Liao L; Pan R; Zhou N; Di N
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jul; 40(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 22223543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.