123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27753217)
1. Transparency, usability, and reproducibility: Guiding principles for improving comparative databases using primates as examples.
Borries C; Sandel AA; Koenig A; Fernandez-Duque E; Kamilar JM; Amoroso CR; Barton RA; Bray J; Di Fiore A; Gilby IC; Gordon AD; Mundry R; Port M; Powell LE; Pusey AE; Spriggs A; Nunn CL
Evol Anthropol; 2016 Sep; 25(5):232-238. PubMed ID: 27753217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. BioSharing: curated and crowd-sourced metadata standards, databases and data policies in the life sciences.
McQuilton P; Gonzalez-Beltran A; Rocca-Serra P; Thurston M; Lister A; Maguire E; Sansone SA
Database (Oxford); 2016; 2016():. PubMed ID: 27189610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Identifying and acting on inappropriate metadata: a critique of the Grattan Institute Report on questionable care in Australian hospitals.
Cooper PD; Smart DR
Diving Hyperb Med; 2017 Mar; 47(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 28357824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A metadata schema for data objects in clinical research.
Canham S; Ohmann C
Trials; 2016 Nov; 17(1):557. PubMed ID: 27881150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing two anesthesia information management system user interfaces: a usability evaluation.
Wanderer JP; Rao AV; Rothwell SH; Ehrenfeld JM
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Nov; 59(11):1023-31. PubMed ID: 23055030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analyses of scientific literature and their validity for judging Latin American production.
Spinak E
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1995 Dec; 29(4):352-9; discussion 359-60. PubMed ID: 8605526
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Making metadata usable in a multi-national research setting.
Ellul C; Foord J; Mooney J
Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):909-18. PubMed ID: 23399024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Standardized Representation of Clinical Study Data Dictionaries with CIMI Archetypes.
Sharma DK; Solbrig HR; Prud'hommeaux E; Pathak J; Jiang G
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2016; 2016():1119-1128. PubMed ID: 28269909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Toward More Transparent and Reproducible Omics Studies Through a Common Metadata Checklist and Data Publications.
Kolker E; Özdemir V; Martens L; Hancock W; Anderson G; Anderson N; Aynacioglu S; Baranova A; Campagna SR; Chen R; Choiniere J; Dearth SP; Feng WC; Ferguson L; Fox G; Frishman D; Grossman R; Heath A; Higdon R; Hutz MH; Janko I; Jiang L; Joshi S; Kel A; Kemnitz JW; Kohane IS; Kolker N; Lancet D; Lee E; Li W; Lisitsa A; Llerena A; MacNealy-Koch C; Marshall JC; Masuzzo P; May A; Mias G; Monroe M; Montague E; Mooney S; Nesvizhskii A; Noronha S; Omenn G; Rajasimha H; Ramamoorthy P; Sheehan J; Smarr L; Smith CV; Smith T; Snyder M; Rapole S; Srivastava S; Stanberry L; Stewart E; Toppo S; Uetz P; Verheggen K; Voy BH; Warnich L; Wilhelm SW; Yandl G
Big Data; 2013 Dec; 1(4):196-201. PubMed ID: 27447251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transparency and Reproducibility of Observational Cohort Studies Using Large Healthcare Databases.
Wang SV; Verpillat P; Rassen JA; Patrick A; Garry EM; Bartels DB
Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2016 Mar; 99(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 26690726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ready to put metadata on the post-2015 development agenda? Linking data publications to responsible innovation and science diplomacy.
Özdemir V; Kolker E; Hotez PJ; Mohin S; Prainsack B; Wynne B; Vayena E; Coşkun Y; Dereli T; Huzair F; Borda-Rodriguez A; Bragazzi NL; Faris J; Ramesar R; Wonkam A; Dandara C; Nair B; Llerena A; Kılıç K; Jain R; Reddy PJ; Gollapalli K; Srivastava S; Kickbusch I
OMICS; 2014 Jan; 18(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 24456464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FAANG, establishing metadata standards, validation and best practices for the farmed and companion animal community.
Harrison PW; Fan J; Richardson D; Clarke L; Zerbino D; Cochrane G; Archibald AL; Schmidt CJ; Flicek P
Anim Genet; 2018 Dec; 49(6):520-526. PubMed ID: 30311252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. User Expectations of Metadata Repositories for Clinical Research.
Löbe M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2018; 253():60-64. PubMed ID: 30147041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On quality assurance and assessment of biological datasets and related statistics.
Vardaki M; Papageorgiou H
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2010; 680():89-97. PubMed ID: 20865490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward more transparent and reproducible omics studies through a common metadata checklist and data publications.
Kolker E; Özdemir V; Martens L; Hancock W; Anderson G; Anderson N; Aynacioglu S; Baranova A; Campagna SR; Chen R; Choiniere J; Dearth SP; Feng WC; Ferguson L; Fox G; Frishman D; Grossman R; Heath A; Higdon R; Hutz MH; Janko I; Jiang L; Joshi S; Kel A; Kemnitz JW; Kohane IS; Kolker N; Lancet D; Lee E; Li W; Lisitsa A; Llerena A; Macnealy-Koch C; Marshall JC; Masuzzo P; May A; Mias G; Monroe M; Montague E; Mooney S; Nesvizhskii A; Noronha S; Omenn G; Rajasimha H; Ramamoorthy P; Sheehan J; Smarr L; Smith CV; Smith T; Snyder M; Rapole S; Srivastava S; Stanberry L; Stewart E; Toppo S; Uetz P; Verheggen K; Voy BH; Warnich L; Wilhelm SW; Yandl G
OMICS; 2014 Jan; 18(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 24456465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Metadata of Registries: Results from an Initiative in Health Services Research.
Stausberg J; Harkener S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():18-22. PubMed ID: 34042697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing Analytical Inspection Criteria for Health IT Personnel with Minimum Training in Cognitive Ergonomics: A Practical Solution to EHR Improving EHR Usability.
Zhang Z; Franklin A; Walji M; Zhang J; Gong Y
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2014; 2014():1277-85. PubMed ID: 25954439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
