These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27753252)
1. Re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour: Excessive, uterine activity is a maternal, neurological emergency. Quinn MJ BJOG; 2016 Nov; 123(12):2048. PubMed ID: 27753252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dinoprostone compared with misoprostol for cervical ripening for induction of labor at term. Church S; Van Meter A; Whitfield R J Midwifery Womens Health; 2009; 54(5):405-411. PubMed ID: 19720343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone. Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term. Chitrakar NS J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The risk of placental abruption when using prostaglandins for cervical ripening in women with preeclampsia: comparing misoprostol versus dinoprostone. Martinez de Tejada B; Martillotti G; Lapaire O; Hoesli I; Irion O J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 Sep; 23(9):988-93. PubMed ID: 19941444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. Ten Eikelder ML; Oude Rengerink K; Jozwiak M; de Leeuw JW; de Graaf IM; van Pampus MG; Holswilder M; Oudijk MA; van Baaren GJ; Pernet PJ; Bax C; van Unnik GA; Martens G; Porath M; van Vliet H; Rijnders RJ; Feitsma AH; Roumen FJ; van Loon AJ; Versendaal H; Weinans MJ; Woiski M; van Beek E; Hermsen B; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW Lancet; 2016 Apr; 387(10028):1619-28. PubMed ID: 26850983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming. Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes. Ayad IA East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of efficacy and safety of sublingual misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening in prelabour rupture of membranes after 34 weeks of gestation. Jha N; Sagili H; Jayalakshmi D; Lakshminarayanan S Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Jan; 291(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 25055933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]