These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27753252)

  • 21. Dinoprostone versus misoprostol: a randomized study of nulliparous women undergoing induction of labor.
    Lokugamage AU; Forsyth SF; Sullivan KR; El Refaey H; Rodeck CH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Feb; 82(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 12648174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of misoprostol, controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert and oxytocin for cervical ripening.
    Silfeler DB; Tandogan B; Ayvaci H; Silfeler I; Yenidede I; Dayicioglu V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Dec; 284(6):1331-7. PubMed ID: 21290140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Authors' reply re: A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in induction of labour.
    Chen W; Xue J; Wen SW
    BJOG; 2016 Nov; 123(12):2048-2049. PubMed ID: 27753261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Induction to delivery interval using transcervical Foley catheter plus oxytocin and vaginal misoprostol: A comparative study at Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria.
    Garba I; Muhammed AS; Muhammad Z; Galadanci HS; Ayyuba R; Abubakar IS
    Ann Afr Med; 2016; 15(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 27549415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Re: Balancing the efficacy and safety of misoprostol: a meta-analysis comparing 25 versus 50 μg of intravaginal misoprostol for the induction of labour: Safety of 25-μg intravaginal tablet of misoprostol for the induction of labour.
    Meller CH; Izbizky GH; Otaño L
    BJOG; 2015 Sep; 122(10):1421-2. PubMed ID: 26307476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Pevzner L; Alfirevic Z; Powers BL; Wing DA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Jun; 156(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 21353372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pre-induction of labour: comparing dinoprostone vaginal insert to repeated prostaglandin administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Facchinetti F; Fontanesi F; Del Giovane C
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Oct; 25(10):1965-9. PubMed ID: 22372421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Zhu L; Zhang C; Cao F; Liu Q; Gu X; Xu J; Li J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e13251. PubMed ID: 30508911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The role of prostaglandins E1 and E2, dinoprostone, and misoprostol in cervical ripening and the induction of labor: a mechanistic approach.
    Bakker R; Pierce S; Myers D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Aug; 296(2):167-179. PubMed ID: 28585102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening before diagnostic hysteroscopy in nulliparous women.
    Inal HA; Ozturk Inal ZH; Tonguc E; Var T
    Fertil Steril; 2015 May; 103(5):1326-31. PubMed ID: 25712577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy.
    Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.
    Duro-Gómez J; Garrido-Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez-Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona-Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 296(4):777-781. PubMed ID: 28831553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of labour induction with misoprostol and dinoprostone and characterization of uterine response based on electrohysterogram.
    Benalcazar-Parra C; Monfort-Orti R; Ye-Lin Y; Prats-Boluda G; Alberola-Rubio J; Perales A; Garcia-Casado J
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(10):1586-1594. PubMed ID: 29251182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Clinical study on dinoprostone suppositories 0.8 mm used in cervical ripening and labor induction of women with term pregnancy of premature rupture of the membranes: a multicenter study].
    Zou LY; Fan L; Duan T; Wang ZL; Ma RM
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Jul; 45(7):492-6. PubMed ID: 21029599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A randomised double-blind study of vaginal misoprostol vs dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labour induction in prolonged pregnancy.
    Lee HY
    Singapore Med J; 1997 Jul; 38(7):292-4. PubMed ID: 9339095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of changes in pre-induction cervical factors' scores following ripening with transcervical foley catheter and intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji AO; Olayemi O; Odukogbe AA; Aimakhu CO; Oladokun A; Akindele FO; Adeniji OI; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2005 Dec; 34(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 16752669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
    Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cervical ripening and induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: a comparison between intracervical gel and vaginal pessary.
    D'Aniello G; Bocchi C; Florio P; Ignacchiti E; Guidoni CG; Centini G; Cito G; Picciolini E; Severi FM; Petraglia F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Sep; 14(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 14694970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Combined Foley's catheter with vaginal misoprostol for pre-induction cervical ripening: A randomised controlled trial.
    Aduloju OP; Akintayo AA; Adanikin AI; Ade-Ojo IP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Dec; 56(6):578-584. PubMed ID: 27385377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.