These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27753432)

  • 1. Imputing defensible values for left-censored 'below level of quantitation' (LoQ) biomarker measurements.
    Pleil JD
    J Breath Res; 2016 Oct; 10(4):045001. PubMed ID: 27753432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. QQ-plots for assessing distributions of biomarker measurements and generating defensible summary statistics.
    Pleil JD
    J Breath Res; 2016 Aug; 10(3):035001. PubMed ID: 27491525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
    Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the agreement of biomarker data in the presence of left-censoring.
    Domthong U; Parikh CR; Kimmel PL; Chinchilli VM;
    BMC Nephrol; 2014 Sep; 15():144. PubMed ID: 25186769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bivariate Left-Censored Measurements in Biomonitoring: A Bayesian Model for the Determination of Biological Limit Values Based on Occupational Exposure Limits.
    Martin Remy A; Wild P
    Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Jun; 61(5):515-527. PubMed ID: 28475797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of methods for managing censored results when calculating the geometric mean.
    Mikkonen HG; Clarke BO; Dasika R; Wallis CJ; Reichman SM
    Chemosphere; 2018 Jan; 191():412-416. PubMed ID: 29049962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Nonparametric empirical Bayes biomarker imputation and estimation.
    Barbehenn A; Zhao SD
    Stat Med; 2024 Aug; 43(19):3742-3758. PubMed ID: 38897921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple imputation for interval censored data with auxiliary variables.
    Hsu CH; Taylor JM; Murray S; Commenges D
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):769-81. PubMed ID: 16755528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation for left-censored biomarker data based on Gibbs sampling method.
    Lee M; Kong L; Weissfeld L
    Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(17):1838-48. PubMed ID: 22359320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiple imputation for multivariate data with missing and below-threshold measurements: time-series concentrations of pollutants in the Arctic.
    Hopke PK; Liu C; Rubin DB
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 11252602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimating mean exposures from censored data: exposure to benzene in the Australian petroleum industry.
    Glass DC; Gray CN
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2001 Jun; 45(4):275-82. PubMed ID: 11378148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left-Censored Missing Value Imputation Approach for MS-Based Proteomics Data with GSimp.
    Wei R; Wang J
    Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2426():119-129. PubMed ID: 36308687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal method for determining the intraclass correlation coefficients of urinary biomarkers such as dialkylphosphates from imputed data.
    Nishihama Y; Lai Y; Isobe T; Nakayama SF
    Environ Int; 2022 Dec; 170():107553. PubMed ID: 36228551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating population distributions when some data are below a limit of detection by using a reverse Kaplan-Meier estimator.
    Gillespie BW; Chen Q; Reichert H; Franzblau A; Hedgeman E; Lepkowski J; Adriaens P; Demond A; Luksemburg W; Garabrant DH
    Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21 Suppl 4():S64-70. PubMed ID: 20386104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of statistical treatments of left-censored environmental data using coincident uncensored data sets: I. Summary statistics.
    Antweiler RC; Taylor HE
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 May; 42(10):3732-8. PubMed ID: 18546715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The multiple imputation method: a case study involving secondary data analysis.
    Walani SR; Cleland CM
    Nurse Res; 2015 May; 22(5):13-9. PubMed ID: 25976532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
    Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Censored Least Squares for Imputing Missing Values in PARAFAC Tensor Factorization.
    Hung EC; Hodzic E; Tan ZC; Meyer AS
    bioRxiv; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39026852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of techniques for assessing central tendency in left-censored data using PCB and p,p'DDE contaminant concentrations from Michigan's Bald Eagle Biosentinel Program.
    Leith KF; Bowerman WW; Wierda MR; Best DA; Grubb TG; Sikarske JG
    Chemosphere; 2010 Jun; 80(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 20416924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Handling data below the limit of quantification in mixed effect models.
    Bergstrand M; Karlsson MO
    AAPS J; 2009 Jun; 11(2):371-80. PubMed ID: 19452283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.