BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27753784)

  • 1. When Less Is More: The indications for MIS Techniques and Separation Surgery in Metastatic Spine Disease.
    Zuckerman SL; Laufer I; Sahgal A; Yamada YJ; Schmidt MH; Chou D; Shin JH; Kumar N; Sciubba DM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Oct; 41 Suppl 20(Suppl 20):S246-S253. PubMed ID: 27753784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal Invasive Surgery Instrumented Fusion versus Conventional Open Surgical Instrumented Fusion for the Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Pranata R; Lim MA; Vania R; Bagus Mahadewa TG
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():e264-e274. PubMed ID: 33418123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Potential of Minimally Invasive Surgery to Treat Metastatic Spinal Disease versus Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lu VM; Alvi MA; Goyal A; Kerezoudis P; Bydon M
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():e859-e868. PubMed ID: 29408300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 10-Year Trends in the Surgical Management of Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Scoping Review.
    Orenday-Barraza JM; Cavagnaro MJ; Avila MJ; Strouse IM; Dowell A; Kisana H; Khan N; Ravinsky R; Baaj AA
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jan; 157():170-186.e3. PubMed ID: 34655822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive percutaneous fixation techniques for metastatic spinal disease.
    Rao PJ; Thayaparan GK; Fairhall JM; Mobbs RJ
    Orthop Surg; 2014 Aug; 6(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 25179352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Mar; 24(3):416-27. PubMed ID: 26565767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Review.
    Flynn SC; Eli IM; Ghogawala Z; Yew AY
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 159():e32-e39. PubMed ID: 34861449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Back pain outcomes after minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review.
    Chan AY; Lien BV; Choi EH; Chan AK; Hanna G; Lopez AM; Brown NJ; Gattas S; Kirillova L; Horton D; Fote G; Hanst B; Perry R; Lee YP; Golshani K; Hsu FPK; Oh MY
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E3. PubMed ID: 32871569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of minimally invasive surgery within a multidisciplinary approach for patients with metastatic spine disease over a decade: A systematic review.
    Schupper AJ; Patel S; Steinberger JM; Germano IM
    Neuro Oncol; 2024 Mar; 26(3):417-428. PubMed ID: 37988270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal access versus open spinal surgery in treating painful spine metastasis: a systematic review.
    Yang Z; Yang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang Z; Chen Y; Shen Y; Han L; Xu D; Sun H
    World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():68. PubMed ID: 25880538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mid-term clinical results of minimally invasive decompression and posterolateral fusion with percutaneous pedicle screws versus conventional approach for degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis.
    Kotani Y; Abumi K; Ito M; Sudo H; Abe Y; Minami A
    Eur Spine J; 2012 Jun; 21(6):1171-7. PubMed ID: 22173610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of open versus minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of thoracolumbar metastases.
    Ntilikina Y; Collinet A; Tigan LV; Fabacher T; Steib JP; Charles YP
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 Jun; 108(4):103274. PubMed ID: 35331924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Surgery Spinal Fusion for Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lu VM; Kerezoudis P; Gilder HE; McCutcheon BA; Phan K; Bydon M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Feb; 42(3):E177-E185. PubMed ID: 27285899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
    Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for patients undergoing intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Helal A; Yolcu YU; Kamath A; Wahood W; Bydon M
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2022 Mar; 214():107176. PubMed ID: 35183850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review.
    Goldstein CL; Macwan K; Sundararajan K; Rampersaud YR
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Jun; 472(6):1727-37. PubMed ID: 24464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: an analysis of minimally invasive, hybrid, and open surgical techniques.
    Uribe JS; Deukmedjian AR; Mummaneni PV; Fu KM; Mundis GM; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Eastlack R; Wang MY; Anand N; Fessler RG; La Marca F; Park P; Lafage V; Deviren V; Bess S; Shaffrey CI;
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E15. PubMed ID: 24785480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive versus open surgery for the correction of adult degenerative scoliosis: a systematic review.
    Lak AM; Lamba N; Pompilus F; Yunusa I; King A; Sultan I; Amamoo J; Al-Otaibi NM; Alasmari M; Zaghloul I; Aglio L; Cerecedo-Lopez CD; Tafel I; Smith TR; Mekary RA; Zaidi H
    Neurosurg Rev; 2021 Apr; 44(2):659-668. PubMed ID: 32166508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.