These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27755334)

  • 1. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
    Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
    Crijns TJ; Janssen SJ; Davis JT; Ring D; Sanchez HB;
    Injury; 2018 Apr; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High reliability in classification of tibia fractures in the Swedish Fracture Register.
    Wennergren D; Ekholm C; Sundfeldt M; Karlsson J; Bhandari M; Möller M
    Injury; 2016 Feb; 47(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 26620119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reliability of the Anterior Humeral Line Index Compared With the Gartland Classification for Posteriorly Hinged Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.
    Murphy-Zane MS; Pyle L
    Orthopedics; 2018 Jul; 41(4):e502-e505. PubMed ID: 29708571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
    Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value.
    Sjödén GO; Movin T; Güntner P; Aspelin P; Ahrengart L; Ersmark H; Sperber A
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Jun; 68(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 9246984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
    Doornberg J; Lindenhovius A; Kloen P; van Dijk CN; Zurakowski D; Ring D
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 16882904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT.
    Bruinsma WE; Guitton TG; Warner JJ; Ring D;
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical Evaluation of Femoral Head Fractures: Which Classification Systems Have the Best Universality, Reliability, and Reproducibility?
    Wu S; Qian G; Huang Q; Dou B; Zheng Q; Wang W; Zhu X; Mei J
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Jan; 482(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 37326487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Femoral fracture classification in the Swedish Fracture Register - a validity study.
    Knutsson SB; Wennergren D; Bojan A; Ekelund J; Möller M
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 May; 20(1):197. PubMed ID: 31068172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distal radius fractures are difficult to classify.
    Wæver D; Madsen ML; Rölfing JHD; Borris LC; Henriksen M; Nagel LL; Thorninger R
    Injury; 2018 Jun; 49 Suppl 1():S29-S32. PubMed ID: 29929689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New classification system for long-bone fractures supplementing the AO/OTA classification.
    Garnavos C; Kanakaris NK; Lasanianos NG; Tzortzi P; West RM
    Orthopedics; 2012 May; 35(5):e709-19. PubMed ID: 22588414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population.
    Glen LZQ; Wong JYS; Tay WX; Li TP; Phua SKA; Manohara R; Chee YH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2023; 62(3):505-510. PubMed ID: 36690511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
    Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study.
    Ansorge A; de Foy M; Poncet A; Gamulin A
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 107(6):102999. PubMed ID: 34216840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of two thoracolumbar fracture classification systems as used by multiple surgeons.
    Wood KB; Khanna G; Vaccaro AR; Arnold PM; Harris MB; Mehbod AA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Jul; 87(7):1423-9. PubMed ID: 15995107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
    Taşkesen A; Demirkale İ; Okkaoğlu MC; Özdemir M; Bilgili MG; Altay M
    Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity of humerus fracture classification in the Swedish fracture register.
    Wennergren D; Stjernström S; Möller M; Sundfeldt M; Ekholm C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Jun; 18(1):251. PubMed ID: 28601085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.