BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27755718)

  • 1. The ethological trap: functional and numerical responses of highly efficient invasive predators driving prey extinctions.
    Spencer RJ; Van Dyke JU; Thompson MB
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):1969-1983. PubMed ID: 27755718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Counteracting effects of a non-native prey on the demography of a native predator culminate in positive population growth.
    Cattau CE; Fletcher RJ; Reichert BE; Kitchens WM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Oct; 26(7):1952-1968. PubMed ID: 27755742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predator behaviour and predation risk in the heterogeneous Arctic environment.
    Lecomte N; Careau V; Gauthier G; Giroux JF
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 18248387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Critically evaluating best management practices for preventing freshwater turtle extinctions.
    Spencer RJ; Van Dyke JU; Thompson MB
    Conserv Biol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):1340-1349. PubMed ID: 28319283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Incidental nest predation in freshwater turtles: inter- and intraspecific differences in vulnerability are explained by relative crypsis.
    Wirsing AJ; Phillips JR; Obbard ME; Murray DL
    Oecologia; 2012 Apr; 168(4):977-88. PubMed ID: 22009341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anti-predator meshing may provide greater protection for sea turtle nests than predator removal.
    O'Connor JM; Limpus CJ; Hofmeister KM; Allen BL; Burnett SE
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171831. PubMed ID: 28187181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Molecular forensics in avian conservation: a DNA-based approach for identifying mammalian predators of ground-nesting birds and eggs.
    Hopken MW; Orning EK; Young JK; Piaggio AJ
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jan; 9():14. PubMed ID: 26738484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation.
    Kovacs EK; Crowther MS; Webb JK; Dickman CR
    Oecologia; 2012 Apr; 168(4):947-57. PubMed ID: 22042524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deadly intentions: naïve introduced foxes show rapid attraction to odour cues of an unfamiliar native prey.
    Bytheway JP; Price CJ; Banks PB
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():30078. PubMed ID: 27416966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Induced changes in island fox (Urocyon littoralis) activity do not mitigate the extinction threat posed by a novel predator.
    Hudgens BR; Garcelon DK
    Oecologia; 2011 Mar; 165(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 20814698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overcoming prey naiveté: Free-living marsupials develop recognition and effective behavioral responses to alien predators in Australia.
    Bytheway JP; Banks PB
    Glob Chang Biol; 2019 May; 25(5):1685-1695. PubMed ID: 30822357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stress triangle: do introduced predators exert indirect costs on native predators and prey?
    Anson JR; Dickman CR; Boonstra R; Jessop TS
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60916. PubMed ID: 23585861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. No evidence for spatial variation in predation risk following restricted-area fox culling.
    Kämmerle JL; Niekrenz S; Storch I
    BMC Ecol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):17. PubMed ID: 31023268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of predation as a limiting factor for bird populations in mesopredator-rich landscapes: a case study of the UK.
    Roos S; Smart J; Gibbons DW; Wilson JD
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 Nov; 93(4):1915-1937. PubMed ID: 29790246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling habituation of introduced predators to unrewarding bird odors for conservation of ground-nesting shorebirds.
    Latham MC; Anderson DP; Norbury G; Price CJ; Banks PB; Latham ADM
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Jan; 29(1):e01814. PubMed ID: 30312506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predator functional response and prey survival: direct and indirect interactions affecting a marked prey population.
    Miller DA; Grand JB; Fondell TF; Anthony M
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Jan; 75(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 16903047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Birds of prey as limiting factors of gamebird populations in Europe: a review.
    Valkama J; Korpimäki E; Arroyo B; Beja P; Bretagnolle V; Bro E; Kenward R; Mañosa S; Redpath SM; Thirgood S; Viñuela J
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2005 May; 80(2):171-203. PubMed ID: 15921048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Naïveté in novel ecological interactions: lessons from theory and experimental evidence.
    Carthey AJ; Banks PB
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2014 Nov; 89(4):932-49. PubMed ID: 25319946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatio-temporal responses of predators to hyperabundant geese affect risk of predation for sympatric-nesting species.
    Flemming SA; Nol E; Kennedy LV; Bédard A; Giroux MA; Smith PA
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221727. PubMed ID: 31461483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Invasive Wild Pigs as Primary Nest Predators for Wild Turkeys.
    Sanders HN; Hewitt DG; Perotto-Baldivieso HL; VerCauteren KC; Snow NP
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2625. PubMed ID: 32060348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 66.