These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27755739)

  • 21. A comparison of cost and quality of three methods for estimating density for wild pig (Sus scrofa).
    Davis AJ; Keiter DA; Kierepka EM; Slootmaker C; Piaggio AJ; Beasley JC; Pepin KM
    Sci Rep; 2020 Feb; 10(1):2047. PubMed ID: 32029837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Simulation-based validation of spatial capture-recapture models: A case study using mountain lions.
    Paterson JT; Proffitt K; Jimenez B; Rotella J; Garrott R
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215458. PubMed ID: 31002709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Integrating data from multiple sources for insights into demographic processes: Simulation studies and proof of concept for hierarchical change-in-ratio models.
    Nilsen EB; Strand O
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194566. PubMed ID: 29596430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States.
    McClure ML; Burdett CL; Farnsworth ML; Lutman MW; Theobald DM; Riggs PD; Grear DA; Miller RS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0133771. PubMed ID: 26267266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Spatially explicit power analyses for occupancy-based monitoring of wolverine in the U.S. Rocky Mountains.
    Ellis MM; Ivan JS; Schwartz MK
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Feb; 28(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 24001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using economic instruments to develop effective management of invasive species: insights from a bioeconomic model.
    McDermott SM; Irwin RE; Taylor BW
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1086-100. PubMed ID: 23967577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Too many wild boar? Modelling fertility control and culling to reduce wild boar numbers in isolated populations.
    Croft S; Franzetti B; Gill R; Massei G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238429. PubMed ID: 32946480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Using counterfactuals to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of controlling biological invasions.
    McConnachie MM; van Wilgen BW; Ferraro PJ; Forsyth AT; Richardson DM; Gaertner M; Cowling RM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Mar; 26(2):475-83. PubMed ID: 27209789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modeling disturbance-based native invasive species control and its implications for management.
    Shackelford N; Renton M; Perring MP; Hobbs RJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Sep; 23(6):1331-44. PubMed ID: 24147406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An open-population hierarchical distance sampling model.
    Sollmann R; Gardner B; Chandler RB; Royle JA; Sillett TS
    Ecology; 2015 Feb; 96(2):325-31. PubMed ID: 26240853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using the robust design framework and relative abundance to predict the population size of pallid sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus in the lower Missouri River.
    Steffensen KD; Powell LA; Pegg MA
    J Fish Biol; 2017 Nov; 91(5):1378-1391. PubMed ID: 28925076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Governmental provisions to manage and eradicate feral swine in areas of the United States.
    Centner TJ; Shuman RM
    Ambio; 2015 Mar; 44(2):121-30. PubMed ID: 24845195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Desires and management preferences of stakeholders regarding feral cats in the Hawaiian islands.
    Lohr CA; Lepczyk CA
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):392-403. PubMed ID: 24372971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Presence-absence versus abundance data for monitoring threatened species.
    Joseph LN; Field SA; Wilcox C; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2006 Dec; 20(6):1679-87. PubMed ID: 17181803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dynamic N-occupancy models: estimating demographic rates and local abundance from detection-nondetection data.
    Rossman S; Yackulic CB; Saunders SP; Reid J; Davis R; Zipkin EF
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3300-3307. PubMed ID: 27912019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Species-specific visitation and removal of baits for delivery of pharmaceuticals to feral swine.
    Campbell TA; Long DB
    J Wildl Dis; 2007 Jul; 43(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 17699086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Open removal models with temporary emigration and population dynamics to inform invasive animal management.
    Udell B; Martin J; Romagosa C; Waddle H; Johnson F; Falk B; Yackel Adams A; Funck S; Ketterlin J; Suarez E; Mazzotti F
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9173. PubMed ID: 35991280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Site-occupancy distribution modeling to correct population-trend estimates derived from opportunistic observations.
    Kéry M; Royle JA; Schmid H; Schaub M; Volet B; Häfliger G; Zbinden N
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):1388-97. PubMed ID: 20337672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Propagule size and structure, life history, and environmental conditions affect establishment success of an invasive species.
    Tabak MA; Webb CT; Miller RS
    Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):10313. PubMed ID: 29985418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Population viability analysis of American mink (Neovison vison) escaped from Danish mink farms.
    Pertoldi C; Rødjajn S; Zalewski A; Demontis D; Loeschcke V; Kjærsgaard A
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jun; 91(6):2530-41. PubMed ID: 23478820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.