519 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27756419)
1. Intrathoracic versus Cervical ANastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: study protocol of the ICAN randomized controlled trial.
van Workum F; Bouwense SA; Luyer MD; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; van der Peet DL; Daams F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Gisbertz SS; Henegouwen MI; Heisterkamp J; Langenhoff BS; Martijnse IS; Grutters JP; Klarenbeek BR; Rovers MM; Rosman C
Trials; 2016 Oct; 17(1):505. PubMed ID: 27756419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis.
van Workum F; van der Maas J; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Luyer MD; Rosman C
Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 103(1):267-273. PubMed ID: 27677565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrathoracic vs Cervical Anastomosis After Totally or Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
van Workum F; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense SAW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; Gisbertz SS; Hannink G; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Jansen W; Kouwenhoven EA; van Lanschot JJB; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; van der Peet DL; Polat F; Ubels S; Wijnhoven BPL; Rovers MM; Rosman C;
JAMA Surg; 2021 Jul; 156(7):601-610. PubMed ID: 33978698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally Invasive Versus open AbdominoThoracic Esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma (MIVATE) - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial DRKS00016773.
Nickel F; Probst P; Studier-Fischer A; Nienhüser H; Pauly J; Kowalewski KF; Weiterer S; Knebel P; Diener MK; Weigand MA; Büchler MW; Schmidt T; Müller-Stich BP
Trials; 2021 Jan; 22(1):41. PubMed ID: 33430937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons between minimally invasive and open esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with cervical anastomosis: a retrospective study.
Li Z; Liu C; Liu Y; Yao S; Xu B; Dong G
J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Jun; 15(1):128. PubMed ID: 32513211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Nakata K; Nagai E; Ohuchida K; Nakamura K; Tanaka M
World J Surg; 2015 May; 39(5):1099-104. PubMed ID: 25582767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial, robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy).
Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Li Z; Sun Y; Mao T; Hua R; Yang Y; Guo X; He Y; Li H; Chen H; Tan L
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):608. PubMed ID: 31226960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Application of cervical triangulating stapled anastomosis in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Tan L; Feng M; Shen Y; Wang H; Li J; Xi Y; Wang Q
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):869-71. PubMed ID: 25273652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A change in clinical practice: a partially stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis reduces morbidity and improves functional outcome after esophagectomy for cancer.
Kondra J; Ong SR; Clifton J; Evans K; Finley RJ; Yee J
Dis Esophagus; 2008; 21(5):422-9. PubMed ID: 19125796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of the stapled suture with the manual suture in the application of minimally invasive esophagectomy].
Wang F; Liu S; Wang J; Chen X; Zheng Q; Wang Z; Xu J; Chen S
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):881-3. PubMed ID: 25273655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Non-placement versus placement of a drainage tube around the cervical anastomosis in McKeown esophagectomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Oshikiri T; Takiguchi G; Miura S; Takase N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Yamashita K; Matsuda Y; Matsuda T; Nakamura T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):758. PubMed ID: 31870427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophageal Resection: Three-year Follow-up of the Previously Reported Randomized Controlled Trial: the TIME Trial.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Cuesta MA; Daams F; Roig Garcia J; Bonavina L; Rosman C; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Ann Surg; 2017 Aug; 266(2):232-236. PubMed ID: 28187044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anastomotic leakage after intrathoracic versus cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis for oesophageal carcinoma in Chinese population: a retrospective cohort study.
Liu YJ; Fan J; He HH; Zhu SS; Chen QL; Cao RH
BMJ Open; 2018 Sep; 8(9):e021025. PubMed ID: 30181184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: preliminary results after introduction of an intrathoracic anastomosis.
van Workum F; van den Wildenberg FJ; Polat F; de Wilt JH; Rosman C
Dig Surg; 2014; 31(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 24776753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct Oral Feeding Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (NUTRIENT II trial): An International, Multicenter, Open-label Randomized Controlled Trial.
Berkelmans GHK; Fransen LFC; Dolmans-Zwartjes ACP; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; Nilsson M; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Luyer MDP
Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):41-47. PubMed ID: 31090563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Biere SS; Cuesta MA; van der Peet DL
Minerva Chir; 2009 Apr; 64(2):121-33. PubMed ID: 19365313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
