These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27757330)

  • 1. Three-dimensional Analysis of Normal Facial Morphologies of Asians and Whites: A Novel Method of Quantitative Analysis.
    Kim JY; Kau CH; Christou T; Ovsenik M; Guk Park Y
    Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2016 Sep; 4(9):e865. PubMed ID: 27757330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of facial morphologies between adult Chinese and Houstonian Caucasian populations using three-dimensional imaging.
    Wirthlin J; Kau CH; English JD; Pan F; Zhou H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 42(9):1100-7. PubMed ID: 23623784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Facial morphologies of an adult Egyptian population and an adult Houstonian white population compared using 3D imaging.
    Seager DC; Kau CH; English JD; Tawfik W; Bussa HI; Ahmed Ael Y
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Sep; 79(5):991-9. PubMed ID: 19705950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional comparison of facial morphology in white populations in Budapest, Hungary, and Houston, Texas.
    Gor T; Kau CH; English JD; Lee RP; Borbely P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):424-32. PubMed ID: 20197183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Cross-Sectional Study to Understand 3D Facial Differences in a Population of African Americans and Caucasians.
    Kau CH; Wang J; Davis M
    Eur J Dent; 2019 Oct; 13(4):485-496. PubMed ID: 31891965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of 3-dimensional surface acquisition to study facial morphology in 5 populations.
    Kau CH; Richmond S; Zhurov A; Ovsenik M; Tawfik W; Borbely P; English JD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S56.e1-9; discussion S56-7. PubMed ID: 20381762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Soft-tissue thickness of South Korean adults with normal facial profiles.
    Cha KS
    Korean J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 43(4):178-85. PubMed ID: 24015387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A 3-dimensional anthropometric evaluation of facial morphology among Chinese and Greek population.
    Liu Y; Kau CH; Pan F; Zhou H; Zhang Q; Zacharopoulos GV
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):e353-8. PubMed ID: 23851867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Esthetic Difference of Chinese Beauty Evaluated by Two Different Human Races Based on Three-Dimensional Average Face Analysis.
    Chen C; Chen Y; Li Q; Kau CH
    J Craniofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 30(5):1435-1440. PubMed ID: 31299738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Facial morphology of Slovenian and Welsh white populations using 3-dimensional imaging.
    Bo Ic M; Kau CH; Richmond S; Hren NI; Zhurov A; Udovic M; Melink S; Ovsenik M
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jul; 79(4):640-5. PubMed ID: 19537876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of facial width on the perception of lip protrusion and its differences between profile and 3-dimensional video clip.
    Wang ZW; Kim HJ; Noh HK; Park HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Apr; 165(4):447-457. PubMed ID: 38165290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging.
    Patel A; Islam SM; Murray K; Goonewardene MS
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():36. PubMed ID: 26490376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the relationship between malar projection and lower facial convexity in terms of perceived attractiveness in 3-dimensional reconstructed images.
    Woo HK; Ajmera DH; Singh P; Li KY; Bornstein MM; Tse KL; Yang Y; Gu M
    Head Face Med; 2020 Apr; 16(1):8. PubMed ID: 32345357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Open-Source Tools for Dense Facial Tissue Depth Mapping of Computed Tomography Models.
    Simmons-Ehrhardt T; Falsetti C; Falsetti AB; Ehrhardt CJ
    Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 90(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 30387384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A 3-dimensional method for analyzing facial soft-tissue morphology of patients with jaw deformities.
    Terajima M; Furuichi Y; Aoki Y; Goto TK; Tokumori K; Nakasima A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):715-22. PubMed ID: 19524830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial morphology in children aged 5-6 years with a Class III malocclusion.
    Krneta B; Primožič J; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 22492465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Comparison of 3D Facial Features in a Population from Zimbabwe and United States.
    Bhaskar E; Kau CH
    Eur J Dent; 2020 Feb; 14(1):100-106. PubMed ID: 32168537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnosis of Class III malocclusion in 7- to 8-year-old children--a 3D evaluation.
    Krneta B; Zhurov A; Richmond S; Ovsenik M
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Aug; 37(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 25336564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Evaluation of Facial Morphology.
    Celebi AA; Kau CH; Ozaydin B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):e470-e474. PubMed ID: 28665846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.