These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27758153)

  • 21. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment.
    Dietz A; Buschermöhle M; Aarnisalo AA; Vanhanen A; Hyyrynen T; Aaltonen O; Löppönen H; Zokoll MA; Kollmeier B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2014 Jul; 134(7):728-37. PubMed ID: 24807850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Sharvard Corpus: a phonemically-balanced Spanish sentence resource for audiology.
    Aubanel V; Lecumberri ML; Cooke M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Sep; 53(9):633-8. PubMed ID: 24863133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO.
    Tamati TN; Pisoni DB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigation into the applicability and optimization of the Dutch matrix sentence test for use with cochlear implant users.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Houben R; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Nov; 53(11):817-28. PubMed ID: 24975235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Development of the Cantonese Hearing In Noise Test (CHINT).
    Wong LL; Soli SD
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):276-89. PubMed ID: 15937409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Overcoming language barriers: Matrix sentence tests with closed speech corpora.
    Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():1-2. PubMed ID: 26365793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T; Neher T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Talker Versus Dialect Effects on Speech Intelligibility: A Symmetrical Study.
    McCloy DR; Wright RA; Souza PE
    Lang Speech; 2015 Sep; 58(Pt 3):371-86. PubMed ID: 26529902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Development and validation of the Leuven intelligibility sentence test with male speaker (LIST-m).
    Jansen S; Koning R; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 24152309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Pupil dilation uncovers extra listening effort in the presence of a single-talker masker.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Festen JM; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 21921797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 1: test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):823-34. PubMed ID: 21988504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An adaptive Australian Sentence Test in Noise (AuSTIN).
    Dawson PW; Hersbach AA; Swanson BA
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):592-600. PubMed ID: 23598772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a Danish speech intelligibility test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(10):729-41. PubMed ID: 19626512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study.
    van Esch TE; Kollmeier B; Vormann M; Lyzenga J; Houtgast T; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Athalye SP; Lutman ME; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 23570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool.
    Semeraro HD; Rowan D; van Besouw RM; Allsopp AA
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.