These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27759412)

  • 1. Marginal fit of indirect composite inlays using a new system for manual fabrication.
    Pott P; Rzasa A; Stiesch M; Eisenburger M
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):223-226. PubMed ID: 27759412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
    Price RB; Gerrow JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of fit accuracy of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated from wax or resin patterns with conventional and CAD-CAM technologies.
    Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Oct; 120(4):530-536. PubMed ID: 30318049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems at 3 years.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Inokoshi S; Willems G; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    J Dent; 1995 Dec; 23(6):329-38. PubMed ID: 8530722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations.
    Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of various gypsum materials on precision of fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia copings.
    Kim JH; Kim KB; Kim WC; Rhee HS; Lee IH; Kim JH
    Dent Mater J; 2015; 34(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 25748454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the marginal adaptation of direct and indirect composite inlay restorations with optical coherence tomography.
    Türk AG; Sabuncu M; Ünal S; Önal B; Ulusoy M
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2016; 24(4):383-90. PubMed ID: 27556210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Modified Semidirect Onlay Technique With Articulated Elastic Model.
    Papazoglou E; Diamantopoulou S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2015 Dec; 23(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 26767243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of different methods of optical impression making on the marginal gap of onlays created with CEREC 3D.
    da Costa JB; Pelogia F; Hagedorn B; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 20533633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Defects of Indirect Inlay Patterns Fabricated Using Additive Manufacturing and Traditional Methods - An Ex Vivo Study.
    Peddi SS; Taduri V; Shivakumar A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2019 May; 27(2):66-75. PubMed ID: 31145558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of CAD-CAM onlays: Influence of preparation design and impression technique.
    Lima FF; Neto CF; Rubo JH; Santos GC; Moraes Coelho Santos MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 29551386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities.
    Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Folwaczny M; Hickel R
    J Adhes Dent; 2004; 6(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 15536855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Proximal direct composite restorations and chairside CAD/CAM inlays: marginal adaptation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel conditioning.
    Bortolotto T; Onisor I; Krejci I
    Clin Oral Investig; 2007 Mar; 11(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 17031673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A; Hooshmand T; Asefzadeh F; Khalilinejad F; Alihemmati M; Van Noort R
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Marginal adaptation, fracture load and macroscopic failure mode of adhesively luted PMMA-based CAD/CAM inlays.
    Ender A; Bienz S; Mörmann W; Mehl A; Attin T; Stawarczyk B
    Dent Mater; 2016 Feb; 32(2):e22-9. PubMed ID: 26723841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
    Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.