BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27759486)

  • 1. Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction.
    Hjorth MH; Stilling M; Søballe K; Nielsen PT; Christensen PH; Kold S
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):575-582. PubMed ID: 27759486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preparation of the Femoral Bone Cavity for Cementless Stems: Broaching vs Compaction. A Five-Year Randomized Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorption Study.
    Hjorth MH; Kold S; Søballe K; Langdahl BL; Nielsen PT; Christensen PH; Stilling M
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1894-1901. PubMed ID: 28111123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ten-year comparison of two different techniques for femoral bone cavity preparation-broaching versus compaction in patients with cementless total hip arthroplasty : a randomized radiostereometric study of 30 total hip arthroplasties in 15 patients operated bilaterally.
    Okowinski M; Hjorth MH; Mosegaard SB; Jürgens-Lahnstein JH; Storgaard Jakobsen S; Hedevang Christensen P; Kold S; Stilling M
    Bone Jt Open; 2021 Dec; 2(12):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 34865512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. No medium-term advantage of electrochemical deposition of hydroxyapatite in cementless femoral stems. 5-year RSA and DXA results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Flatøy B; Röhrl SM; Bøe B; Nordsletten L
    Acta Orthop; 2016 Feb; 87(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 26364953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrashort versus Conventional Anatomic Cementless Femoral Stems in the Same Patients Younger Than 55 Years.
    Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Sep; 474(9):2008-17. PubMed ID: 27260482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Good stability but high periprosthetic bone mineral loss and late-occurring periprosthetic fractures with use of uncemented tapered femoral stems in patients with a femoral neck fracture.
    Sköldenberg OG; Sjöö H; Kelly-Pettersson P; Bodén H; Eisler T; Stark A; Muren O
    Acta Orthop; 2014 Aug; 85(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 24954490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower periprosthetic bone loss and good fixation of an ultra-short stem compared to a conventional stem in uncemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Salemyr M; Muren O; Ahl T; Bodén H; Eisler T; Stark A; Sköldenberg O
    Acta Orthop; 2015; 86(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 26134386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Periprosthetic bone remodelling of two types of uncemented femoral implant with proximal hydroxyapatite coating: a 3-year follow-up study addressing the influence of prosthesis design and preoperative bone density on periprosthetic bone loss.
    Rahmy AI; Gosens T; Blake GM; Tonino A; Fogelman I
    Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):281-9. PubMed ID: 14661072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stable migration pattern of an ultra-short anatomical uncemented hip stem: a prospective study with 2 years radiostereometric analysis follow-up.
    Mahmoud AN; Kesteris U; Flivik G
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 28165591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased risk of periprosthetic femur fractures associated with a unique cementless stem design.
    Watts CD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Berry DJ; Hanssen AD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 473(6):2045-53. PubMed ID: 25502478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
    Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Risk factors for post-operative periprosthetic fractures following primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally coated double-tapered cementless femoral component.
    Gromov K; Bersang A; Nielsen CS; Kallemose T; Husted H; Troelsen A
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Apr; 99-B(4):451-457. PubMed ID: 28385933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Synergy cementless femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 15 years.
    De Martino I; De Santis V; D'Apolito R; Sculco PK; Cross MB; Gasparini G
    Bone Joint J; 2017 Jan; 99-B(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 28053254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proximal Femur Bone Density Decreases up to 5 Years After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young, Active Patients.
    Nam D; Barrack RL; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2825-2830. PubMed ID: 27378640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equal Primary Fixation of Resurfacing Stem, but Inferior Cup Fixation With Anterolateral vs Posterior Surgical Approach. A 2-Year Blinded Randomized Radiostereometric and Dual-energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Study of Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty.
    Hjorth MH; Lorenzen ND; Søballe K; Jakobsen SS; Stilling M
    J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3412-3420. PubMed ID: 28641972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A prospective cohort study on the short collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem using RSA and DXA. Primary stability but no prevention of proximal bone loss in 27 patients followed for 2 years.
    Lazarinis S; Mattsson P; Milbrink J; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
    Acta Orthop; 2013 Feb; 84(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 23343375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unstable versus stable uncemented femoral stems: a radiological study of periprosthetic bone changes in two types of uncemented stems with different concepts of fixation.
    Bodén H; Adolphson P; Oberg M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Jul; 124(6):382-92. PubMed ID: 15112084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decreased femoral periprosthetic bone mineral density: a comparative study using DXA in patients after cementless total hip arthroplasty with osteonecrosis of the femoral head versus primary osteoarthritis.
    Craiovan B; Woerner M; Winkler S; Springorum HR; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Keshmiri A
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2016 May; 136(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 26891850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
    Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Total hip arthroplasty with double-tapered cementless femoral stem for hip bony].
    Zhang Q; Liu M; Chai W; Zhang G; Chen J; Li Z; Dong X; Zhou Y; Wang X; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 23672124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.