These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27760219)
21. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Trost SG; Loprinzi PD; Moore R; Pfeiffer KA Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Jul; 43(7):1360-8. PubMed ID: 21131873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cut points of the Actigraph GT9X for moderate and vigorous intensity physical activity at four different wear locations. Rhudy MB; Dreisbach SB; Moran MD; Ruggiero MJ; Veerabhadrappa P J Sports Sci; 2020 Mar; 38(5):503-510. PubMed ID: 31865845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Calibration of hip accelerometers for measuring physical activity and sedentary behaviours in adults with Down syndrome. Agiovlasitis S; Ballenger BK; Schultz EE; Du Q; Motl RW J Intellect Disabil Res; 2023 Feb; 67(2):172-181. PubMed ID: 36514268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Validation of accelerometer cut points in toddlers with and without cerebral palsy. Oftedal S; Bell KL; Davies PS; Ware RS; Boyd RN Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2014 Sep; 46(9):1808-15. PubMed ID: 25134003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5-8 years old. Duncan MJ; Wilson S; Tallis J; Eyre E Eur J Pediatr; 2016 Dec; 175(12):2019-2021. PubMed ID: 27785561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Calibration of wrist-worn ActiWatch 2 and ActiGraph wGT3X for assessment of physical activity in young adults. Lee P; Tse CY Gait Posture; 2019 Feb; 68():141-149. PubMed ID: 30476691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Actigraph accelerometer-defined boundaries for sedentary behaviour and physical activity intensities in 7 year old children. Pulsford RM; Cortina-Borja M; Rich C; Kinnafick FE; Dezateux C; Griffiths LJ PLoS One; 2011; 6(8):e21822. PubMed ID: 21853021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparability of children's sedentary time estimates derived from wrist worn GENEActiv and hip worn ActiGraph accelerometer thresholds. Boddy LM; Noonan RJ; Kim Y; Rowlands AV; Welk GJ; Knowles ZR; Fairclough SJ J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Oct; 21(10):1045-1049. PubMed ID: 29650338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Personalised Accelerometer Cut-point Prediction for Older Adults' Movement Behaviours using a Machine Learning approach. Nnamoko N; Cabrera-Diego LA; Campbell D; Sanders G; Fairclough SJ; Korkontzelos I Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Sep; 208():106165. PubMed ID: 34118492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Establishing school day pedometer step count cut-points using ROC curves in low-income children. Burns RD; Brusseau TA; Fu Y; Hannon JC Prev Med; 2016 May; 86():117-22. PubMed ID: 26876627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cross-validation of cut-points in preschool children using different accelerometer placements and data axes. Altenburg TM; de Vries L; Op den Buijsch R; Eyre E; Dobell A; Duncan M; Chinapaw MJM J Sports Sci; 2022 Feb; 40(4):379-385. PubMed ID: 35040373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer in measuring physical activity of Malawian toddlers. Pulakka A; Cheung YB; Ashorn U; Penpraze V; Maleta K; Phuka JC; Ashorn P Acta Paediatr; 2013 Dec; 102(12):1192-8. PubMed ID: 24102811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Calibration and cross-validation of a wrist-worn Actigraph in young preschoolers. Johansson E; Ekelund U; Nero H; Marcus C; Hagströmer M Pediatr Obes; 2015 Feb; 10(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24408275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Calibration and Validation of a Wrist- and Hip-Worn Actigraph Accelerometer in 4-Year-Old Children. Johansson E; Larisch LM; Marcus C; Hagströmer M PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162436. PubMed ID: 27617962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Validation and calibration of an accelerometer in preschool children. Pate RR; Almeida MJ; McIver KL; Pfeiffer KA; Dowda M Obesity (Silver Spring); 2006 Nov; 14(11):2000-6. PubMed ID: 17135617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Determining activity count cut-points for measurement of physical activity using the Actiwatch2 accelerometer. Neil-Sztramko SE; Rafn BS; Gotay CC; Campbell KL Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():95-100. PubMed ID: 28108333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Everything you wanted to know about selecting the "right" Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but…: a systematic review. Kim Y; Beets MW; Welk GJ J Sci Med Sport; 2012 Jul; 15(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 22306372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accelerometer-derived physical activity estimation in preschoolers - comparison of cut-point sets incorporating the vector magnitude vs the vertical axis. Leeger-Aschmann CS; Schmutz EA; Zysset AE; Kakebeeke TH; Messerli-Bürgy N; Stülb K; Arhab A; Meyer AH; Munsch S; Jenni OG; Puder JJ; Kriemler S BMC Public Health; 2019 May; 19(1):513. PubMed ID: 31060538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of ActiGraph GT3X+ and Actical accelerometer data in 9-11-year-old Canadian children. Borghese MM; Tremblay MS; LeBlanc AG; Leduc G; Boyer C; Chaput JP J Sports Sci; 2017 Mar; 35(6):517-524. PubMed ID: 27103499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]