These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27760996)

  • 1. Coverage recommendation for genotyping analysis of highly heterologous species using next-generation sequencing technology.
    Song K; Li L; Zhang G
    Sci Rep; 2016 Oct; 6():35736. PubMed ID: 27760996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Low-depth genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) in a bovine population: strategies to maximize the selection of high quality genotypes and the accuracy of imputation.
    Brouard JS; Boyle B; Ibeagha-Awemu EM; Bissonnette N
    BMC Genet; 2017 Apr; 18(1):32. PubMed ID: 28381212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genome-Wide SNP Calling from Genotyping by Sequencing (GBS) Data: A Comparison of Seven Pipelines and Two Sequencing Technologies.
    Torkamaneh D; Laroche J; Belzile F
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161333. PubMed ID: 27547936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of seven SNP calling pipelines for the next-generation sequencing data of chickens.
    Liu J; Shen Q; Bao H
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262574. PubMed ID: 35100292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development of SNP-genotyping arrays in two shellfish species.
    Lapègue S; Harrang E; Heurtebise S; Flahauw E; Donnadieu C; Gayral P; Ballenghien M; Genestout L; Barbotte L; Mahla R; Haffray P; Klopp C
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Jul; 14(4):820-30. PubMed ID: 24447767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of genotyping-by-sequencing analysis methods on low-coverage crop datasets shows advantages of a new workflow, GB-eaSy.
    Wickland DP; Battu G; Hudson KA; Diers BW; Hudson ME
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(1):586. PubMed ID: 29281959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing a few SNP calling algorithms using low-coverage sequencing data.
    Yu X; Sun S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Sep; 14():274. PubMed ID: 24044377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of sequencing coverage and genotyping strategies to assess neutral and adaptive diversity.
    Benjelloun B; Boyer F; Streeter I; Zamani W; Engelen S; Alberti A; Alberto FJ; BenBati M; Ibnelbachyr M; Chentouf M; Bechchari A; Rezaei HR; Naderi S; Stella A; Chikhi A; Clarke L; Kijas J; Flicek P; Taberlet P; Pompanon F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Nov; 19(6):1497-1515. PubMed ID: 31359622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of whole-genome (13X) and capture (87X) resequencing methods for SNP and genotype callings.
    Roux PF; Marthey S; Djari A; Moroldo M; Esquerré D; Estellé J; Klopp C; Lagarrigue S; Demeure O
    Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 25515399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequence-based genotyping for marker discovery and co-dominant scoring in germplasm and populations.
    Truong HT; Ramos AM; Yalcin F; de Ruiter M; van der Poel HJ; Huvenaars KH; Hogers RC; van Enckevort LJ; Janssen A; van Orsouw NJ; van Eijk MJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37565. PubMed ID: 22662172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Haplotyping RAD loci: an efficient method to filter paralogs and account for physical linkage.
    Willis SC; Hollenbeck CM; Puritz JB; Gold JR; Portnoy DS
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):955-965. PubMed ID: 28042915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybrid peeling for fast and accurate calling, phasing, and imputation with sequence data of any coverage in pedigrees.
    Whalen A; Ros-Freixedes R; Wilson DL; Gorjanc G; Hickey JM
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):67. PubMed ID: 30563452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using genotype array data to compare multi- and single-sample variant calls and improve variant call sets from deep coverage whole-genome sequencing data.
    Shringarpure SS; Mathias RA; Hernandez RD; O'Connor TD; Szpiech ZA; Torres R; De La Vega FM; Bustamante CD; Barnes KC; Taub MA;
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1147-1153. PubMed ID: 28035032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A High-Density SNP Genetic Linkage Map and QTL Analysis of Growth-Related Traits in a Hybrid Family of Oysters (Crassostrea gigas × Crassostrea angulata) Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing.
    Wang J; Li L; Zhang G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 May; 6(5):1417-26. PubMed ID: 26994291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fast-GBS: a new pipeline for the efficient and highly accurate calling of SNPs from genotyping-by-sequencing data.
    Torkamaneh D; Laroche J; Bastien M; Abed A; Belzile F
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 28049422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Skim-based genotyping by sequencing.
    Golicz AA; Bayer PE; Edwards D
    Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1245():257-70. PubMed ID: 25373763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning and Filling: Ultra-Dense SNP Genotyping Combining Genotyping-By-Sequencing, SNP Array and Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.
    Torkamaneh D; Belzile F
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131533. PubMed ID: 26161900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SNP discovery in nonmodel organisms: strand bias and base-substitution errors reduce conversion rates.
    Gonçalves da Silva A; Barendse W; Kijas JW; Barris WC; McWilliam S; Bunch RJ; McCullough R; Harrison B; Hoelzel AR; England PR
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):723-36. PubMed ID: 25388640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generation of SNP datasets for orangutan population genomics using improved reduced-representation sequencing and direct comparisons of SNP calling algorithms.
    Greminger MP; Stölting KN; Nater A; Goossens B; Arora N; Bruggmann R; Patrignani A; Nussberger B; Sharma R; Kraus RH; Ambu LN; Singleton I; Chikhi L; van Schaik CP; Krützen M
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Jan; 15():16. PubMed ID: 24405840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.