These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27761036)

  • 1. Does C-MAC
    Patil VV; Subramanya BH; Kiranchand N; Bhaskar SB; Dammur S
    Indian J Anaesth; 2016 Oct; 60(10):732-736. PubMed ID: 27761036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of intubating conditions for nasotracheal intubation with standard direct Macintosh laryngoscope versus C-MAC® video laryngoscope employing cuff inflation technique in adult patients.
    Kasaudhan S; Gupta M; Singh K; Khan A
    Indian J Anaesth; 2021 Sep; 65(Suppl 3):S104-S109. PubMed ID: 34703054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Evaluation of McGrath MAC, Truview Video Laryngoscopes and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Surgery under General Anaesthesia.
    Kaur G; Gupta S; Mehta N; Dhingra JS
    Anesth Essays Res; 2020; 14(1):20-24. PubMed ID: 32843786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A randomized controlled comparison of non-channeled king vision, McGrath MAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with predicted difficult intubations.
    Zhu H; Liu J; Suo L; Zhou C; Sun Y; Jiang H
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31470814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The usefulness of the McGrath MAC laryngoscope in comparison with Airwayscope and Macintosh laryngoscope during routine nasotracheal intubation: a randomaized controlled trial.
    Sato Boku A; Sobue K; Kako E; Tachi N; Okumura Y; Kanazawa M; Hashimoto M; Harada J
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):160. PubMed ID: 29191160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McGrath Video Laryngoscopy Facilitates Routine Nasotracheal Intubation in Patients Undergoing Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Comparison With Macintosh Laryngoscopy.
    Kwak HJ; Lee SY; Lee SY; Cho SH; Kim HS; Kim JY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Feb; 74(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 26279490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic Response to Orotracheal Intubation: Comparison between Macintosh, McCoy, and C-MAC Video Laryngoscope.
    Aggarwal H; Kaur S; Baghla N; Kaur S
    Anesth Essays Res; 2019; 13(2):308-312. PubMed ID: 31198251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized controlled trial comparing C Mac D Blade and Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing surgeries for head and neck cancer.
    Hazarika H; Saxena A; Meshram P; Kumar Bhargava A
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2018; 12(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 29416454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in lateral position.
    Bhat R; Sanickop CS; Patil MC; Umrani VS; Dhorigol MG
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2015; 31(2):226-9. PubMed ID: 25948906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq(®) NT, McGrath(®) MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin.
    Gómez-Ríos MÁ; Pinegger S; de Carrillo Mantilla M; Vizcaino L; Barreto-Calvo P; Paech MJ; Gómez-Ríos D; López-Calviño B
    Braz J Anesthesiol; 2016; 66(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 27108827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ease of intubation and hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubation using C-MAC videolaryngoscope with D blade: A comparison with use of traditional Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Rajan S; Kadapamannil D; Barua K; Tosh P; Paul J; Kumar L
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2018; 34(3):381-385. PubMed ID: 30386024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized controlled trial comparing McGRATH series 5 videolaryngoscope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation.
    Ambulkar R; Ranganathan P; Savarkar S; Divatia JV
    J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol; 2020; 36(4):477-482. PubMed ID: 33840927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Yumul R; Elvir-Lazo OL; White PF; Sloninsky A; Kaplan M; Kariger R; Naruse R; Parker N; Pham C; Zhang X; Wender RH
    J Clin Anesth; 2016 Jun; 31():71-7. PubMed ID: 27185681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
    Lili X; Zhiyong H; Jianjun S
    J Neurosurg Anesthesiol; 2014 Jan; 26(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23764717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
    Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of Cricoid Pressure on Laryngeal View During Macintosh, McGrath MAC X-Blade and GlideScope Video Laryngoscopies.
    Arslan Zİ; Solak M
    Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim; 2017 Dec; 45(6):361-366. PubMed ID: 29359076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A randomised crossover trial comparing the Airtraq(®) NT, McGrath(®) MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation of simulated easy and difficult airways in a manikin].
    Gómez-Ríos MÁ; Pinegger S; de Carrillo Mantilla M; Vizcaino L; Barreto-Calvo P; Paech MJ; Gómez-Ríos D; López-Calviño B
    Rev Bras Anestesiol; 2016; 66(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 26993409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of C-MAC Videolaryngoscope with Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope in Patients with Normal Airway Predictors.
    Kumari M; Aastha ; Kumari A; Bathla S; Sabharwal N; Das AK
    Anesth Essays Res; 2022; 16(3):326-330. PubMed ID: 36620111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of endotracheal intubation time in neutral position between C-Mac
    Ahmed SM; Doley K; Athar M; Raza N; Siddiqi OA; Ali S
    Indian J Anaesth; 2017 Apr; 61(4):338-343. PubMed ID: 28515523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nasotracheal intubation performance with the mcgrath videolaryngoscope versus macintosh laryngoscope in oral and maxillofacial surgery- An observational study.
    Sengel N; Karabulut G; Kavuncuoğlu D; Selmi NH; Sivgin V; Toprak ME
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2022 May; 25(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 35593613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.