BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27761343)

  • 1. Effect of orthodontic debonding and residual adhesive removal on 3D enamel microroughness.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Tomkowski R; Tandecka K; Stepien P; Szatkiewicz T; Sporniak-Tutak K; Grocholewicz K
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2558. PubMed ID: 27761343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional analysis of enamel surface alteration resulting from orthodontic clean-up -comparison of three different tools.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Tandecka K; Szatkiewicz T; Stępień P; Sporniak-Tutak K; Grocholewicz K
    BMC Oral Health; 2015 Nov; 15(1):146. PubMed ID: 26581876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of enamel roughness after orthodontic debonding and clean-up procedures using zirconia, tungsten carbide, and white stone burs: an in vitro study.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jul; 23(1):478. PubMed ID: 37443027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enamel Surface Roughness after Debonding: A Comparative Study using Three Different Burs.
    Garg R; Dixit P; Khosla T; Gupta P; Kalra H; Kumar P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 29807961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of removing adhesive from tooth surfaces by Er:YAG laser and a composite bur on enamel surface roughnessand pulp chamber temperature.
    Yassaei S; Aghili H; Joshan N
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2015; 12(3):254-9. PubMed ID: 26005466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A Comparative Evaluation of Enamel Surface Roughness of Two Different Bonding Adhesives After Debonding With Atomic Force Microscopy.
    Doddavarapu S; K B; Singaraju GS; Yamini Priyanka JS; Vivek Reddy G; Mandava P
    Cureus; 2022 Nov; 14(11):e31661. PubMed ID: 36420047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of enamel surface roughness after orthodontic bracket debonding with atomic force microscopy.
    Mohebi S; Shafiee HA; Ameli N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):521-527. PubMed ID: 28257737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of enamel surface roughness and morphology after orthodontic debonding: Traditional cleanup systems versus polymer bur.
    Soares Tenório KC; Neupmann Feres MF; Tanaka CJ; Augusto MKM; Rodrigues JA; Pereira da Silva HD; Arana-Chavez VE; Roscoe MG
    Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):546-554. PubMed ID: 32493624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of the Effects of Various Methods Used to Remove Adhesive from Tooth Surfaces on Surface Roughness and Temperature Changes in the Pulp Chamber.
    Amasyalı M; Sabuncuoğlu FA; Ersahan Ş; Oktay EA
    Turk J Orthod; 2019 Sep; 32(3):132-138. PubMed ID: 31565687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of various debonding and adhesive clearance methods on enamel surface: an in vitro study.
    Fan XC; Chen L; Huang XF
    BMC Oral Health; 2017 Feb; 17(1):58. PubMed ID: 28241812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system.
    Ghaleb L; Al-Worafi NA; Thawaba A; Abdulqader AA; Alkamel A; Abdo Y; Yang Z; Noman N; Al-Aroomi MA; Yulou T
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):358. PubMed ID: 38509532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enamel surface roughness after debonding of orthodontic brackets and various clean-up techniques.
    Ahrari F; Akbari M; Akbari J; Dabiri G
    J Dent (Tehran); 2013 Jan; 10(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 23724206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enamel surface roughness after debonding.
    Karan S; Kircelli BH; Tasdelen B
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1081-8. PubMed ID: 20677958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of orthodontic debonding and adhesive removal on the enamel - current knowledge and future perspectives - a systematic review.
    Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Szatkiewicz T; Tomkowski R; Tandecka K; Grocholewicz K
    Med Sci Monit; 2014 Oct; 20():1991-2001. PubMed ID: 25327612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enamel Roughness Changes after Removal of Orthodontic Adhesive.
    Degrazia FW; Genari B; Ferrazzo VA; Santos-Pinto AD; Grehs RA
    Dent J (Basel); 2018 Aug; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 30082662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enamel surface roughness of preferred debonding and polishing protocols.
    Webb BJ; Koch J; Hagan JL; Ballard RW; Armbruster PC
    J Orthod; 2016 Mar; 43(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 26282121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Bracket Debonding and Adhesive Resin Removal Using Different Burs with and without the Aid of a Magnifying Loupe.
    Thawaba AA; Albelasy NF; Elsherbini AM; Hafez AM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Nov; 23(11):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 37073931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Different Adhesive Resin Removal Methods after Debonding Ceramic Orthodontic Molar Tubes: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.
    Atmaca Z; Ulusoy M; Ulusoy C
    Scanning; 2022; 2022():4853035. PubMed ID: 36474710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enamel Analysis by 3D Scanning after Three Orthodontic Clean-Up Procedures: An In-Vitro Test of a New Piezoelectric Tool.
    Nardi GM; Mazur M; Grassi R; Rifuggiato S; Stiuso V; Janiszewska-Olszowska J; Ottolenghi L; Barbato E; Minetola P; Iuliano L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro.
    Ryf S; Flury S; Palaniappan S; Lussi A; van Meerbeek B; Zimmerli B
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21228118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.