These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27761704)
1. Limbal conjunctival versus amniotic membrane in the intraoperative application of mitomycin C for recurrent pterygium: a randomized controlled trial. Chen R; Huang G; Liu S; Ma W; Yin X; Zhou S Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 255(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 27761704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Two Techniques for the Treatment of Recurrent Pterygium: Amniotic Membrane vs Conjunctival Autograft Combined with Mitomycin C. Katırcıoglu YA; Altiparmak U; Engur Goktas S; Cakir B; Singar E; Ornek F Semin Ophthalmol; 2015; 30(5-6):321-7. PubMed ID: 24506693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of limbal-conjunctival autograft and intraoperative 0.02% mitomycin-C for treatment of primary pterygium. Akinci A; Zilelioglu O Int Ophthalmol; 2007 Oct; 27(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17684704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized trial of pterygium surgery with mitomycin C application using conjunctival autograft versus conjunctival-limbal autograft. Kheirkhah A; Hashemi H; Adelpour M; Nikdel M; Rajabi MB; Behrouz MJ Ophthalmology; 2012 Feb; 119(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 22153864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Mitomycin C in Early Conjunctival Inflammation after Pterygium Surgery. da Costa Paula C; Julio G; Campos P; Pujol P; Asaad M Curr Eye Res; 2017 May; 42(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 27854142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postoperative conjunctival inflammation after pterygium surgery with amniotic membrane transplantation versus conjunctival autograft. Kheirkhah A; Nazari R; Nikdel M; Ghassemi H; Hashemi H; Behrouz MJ Am J Ophthalmol; 2011 Nov; 152(5):733-8. PubMed ID: 21742306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Conjunctival limbal autograft versus simple excision with intra-operative mitomycin C in pterygium surgery: a comparative study]. Malek I; Zghal I; Chebbi A; Lajili Z; Boujemaa C; Nacef L; Bouguila H; Saida Ayed S J Fr Ophtalmol; 2013 Mar; 36(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 23238071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ten-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C and limbal conjunctival autograft in pterygium surgery. Young AL; Ho M; Jhanji V; Cheng LL Ophthalmology; 2013 Dec; 120(12):2390-2395. PubMed ID: 23870302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Options and adjuvants in surgery for pterygium: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Kaufman SC; Jacobs DS; Lee WB; Deng SX; Rosenblatt MI; Shtein RM Ophthalmology; 2013 Jan; 120(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 23062647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of pterygium: our experience and a simplified treatment algorithm. Kodavoor SK; Joseph AJ; Ramamurthy S; Dandapani R Rom J Ophthalmol; 2024; 68(2):108-113. PubMed ID: 39006329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fifteen-year results of a randomized controlled trial comparing 0.02% mitomycin C, limbal conjunctival autograft, and combined mitomycin C with limbal conjunctival autograft in recurrent pterygium surgery. Kam KW; Young AL Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 257(12):2683-2690. PubMed ID: 31650270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparative study of recurrent pterygium surgery: limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation versus mitomycin C with conjunctival flap. Mutlu FM; Sobaci G; Tatar T; Yildirim E Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):817-21. PubMed ID: 10201608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of pterygium recurrence rates after limbal conjunctival autograft transplantation and other techniques: meta-analysis. Zheng K; Cai J; Jhanji V; Chen H Cornea; 2012 Dec; 31(12):1422-7. PubMed ID: 22643650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transplantation of conjunctival limbal autograft and amniotic membrane vs mitomycin C and amniotic membrane in treatment of recurrent pterygium. Fallah MR; Golabdar MR; Amozadeh J; Zare MA; Moghimi S; Fakhraee G Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):420-4. PubMed ID: 17159974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Combined conjunctival rotational autograft with 0.02% mitomycin C in primary pterygium surgery: a long-term follow-up study. Tsim NC; Young AL; Jhanji V; Ho M; Cheng LL Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Oct; 99(10):1396-400. PubMed ID: 25837606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-dose intraoperative mitomycin-C versus conjunctival autograft in primary pterygium surgery: long term follow-up. Sharma A; Gupta A; Ram J; Gupta A Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2000; 31(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 10928667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of three methods for the treatment of pterygium: amniotic membrane graft, conjunctival autograft and conjunctival autograft plus mitomycin C. Katircioğlu YA; Altiparmak UE; Duman S Orbit; 2007 Mar; 26(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 17510864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intraoperative mitomycin C versus autologous conjunctival autograft in surgery of primary pterygium with four-year follow-up. Koranyi G; Artzén D; Seregard S; Kopp ED Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 90(3):266-70. PubMed ID: 20528781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of limbal conjunctival autograft and low-dose mitomycin C in the treatment of recurrent pterygium. Nabawi KS; Ghonim MA; Ali MH Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2003; 34(3):193-6. PubMed ID: 12757091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of intra-operative 0.02% mitomycin C and sutureless limbal conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery: five-year follow-up. Jiang J; Gong J; Li W; Hong C Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 93(7):e568-72. PubMed ID: 25573636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]