These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27761912)

  • 1. How adults with a profound intellectual disability engage others in interaction.
    Antaki C; Crompton RJ; Walton C; Finlay WML
    Sociol Health Illn; 2017 May; 39(4):581-598. PubMed ID: 27761912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examination of the communication interface between students with severe to profound and multiple intellectual disability and educational staff during structured teaching sessions.
    Bunning K; Smith C; Kennedy P; Greenham C
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 Jan; 57(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 22151248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attuning: A Communication Process between People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disability and Their Interaction Partners.
    Griffiths C; Smith M
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2016 Mar; 29(2):124-38. PubMed ID: 25753970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How staff pursue questions to adults with intellectual disabilities.
    Finlay WM; Antaki C
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2012 Apr; 56(4):361-70. PubMed ID: 21917051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seven interactional benefits of physical tasks for people with intellectual disability.
    Antaki C
    Intellect Dev Disabil; 2012 Aug; 50(4):311-21. PubMed ID: 22861132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Open-class repair initiations in conversations involving middle-aged hearing aid users with mild to moderate loss.
    Laakso M; Salmenlinna I; Aaltonen T; Koskela I; Ruusuvuori J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2019 Jul; 54(4):620-633. PubMed ID: 30859679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A model of processes that underpin positive relationships for adults with severe intellectual disability.
    Johnson H; Douglas J; Bigby C; Iacono T
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2012 Dec; 37(4):324-36. PubMed ID: 23171312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. To initiate repair or not? Coping with difficulties in the talk of adults with intellectual disabilities.
    Antaki C; Chinn D; Walton C; Finlay WML; Sempik J
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 Nov; 34(10-11):954-976. PubMed ID: 31707864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Communications between staff and adults with intellectual disabilities in naturally occurring settings.
    McConkey R; Morris I; Purcell M
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 1999 Jun; 43 ( Pt 3)():194-205. PubMed ID: 10392606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Joint attention behaviours in people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: the influence of the context.
    Neerinckx H; Maes B
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2016 Nov; 29(6):574-584. PubMed ID: 26427610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. You and me: The structural basis for the interaction of people with severe and profound intellectual disability and others.
    Griffiths C; Smith M
    J Intellect Disabil; 2017 Jun; 21(2):103-117. PubMed ID: 27099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two conversational practices for encouraging adults with intellectual disabilities to reflect on their activities.
    Antaki C
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 Jun; 57(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 22553965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction with a person with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: a case study in dialogue with an experienced staff member.
    Hostyn I; Maes B
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2013 Sep; 38(3):189-204. PubMed ID: 23984881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mediating Community Participation: Practice of Support Workers in Initiating, Facilitating or Disrupting Encounters between People with and without Intellectual Disability.
    Bigby C; Wiesel I
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2015 Jul; 28(4):307-18. PubMed ID: 25565134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactional patterns between staff and clients with borderline to mild intellectual disabilities.
    Reuzel E; Embregts PJ; Bosman AM; van Nieuwenhuijzen M; Jahoda A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2013 Jan; 57(1):53-66. PubMed ID: 22283853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dilemma for staff in 'playing a game' with a person with profound intellectual disabilities: empowerment, inclusion and competence in interactional practice.
    Finlay WM; Antaki C; Walton C; Stribling P
    Sociol Health Illn; 2008 May; 30(4):531-49. PubMed ID: 18298620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Offering choices to people with intellectual disabilities: an interactional study.
    Antaki C; Finlay W; Walton C; Pate L
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Dec; 52(12):1165-75. PubMed ID: 18627430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Forms of resistance in people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities.
    Nicholson C; Finlay WML; Stagg S
    Sociol Health Illn; 2021 Mar; 43(3):642-659. PubMed ID: 33635551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Effectiveness of Intensive Interaction, A Systematic Literature Review.
    Hutchinson N; Bodicoat A
    J Appl Res Intellect Disabil; 2015 Nov; 28(6):437-54. PubMed ID: 25565017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Communicative empowerment of people with intellectual disability.
    van Nijnatten C; Heestermans M
    J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2012 Jun; 37(2):100-11. PubMed ID: 22563691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.