129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27762379)
1. The polling crisis: How to tell what people really think.
Skibba R
Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7625):304-306. PubMed ID: 27762379
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Opinion polling: taking the voters' pulse.
Reichhardt T
Nature; 2004 Feb; 427(6977):772-3. PubMed ID: 14985729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Chapter II. Differences between the telephone and personal interview data.
Groves RM; Miller PV; Cannell CF
Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):11-9. PubMed ID: 15791751
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal mortality: the figures--value and validity.
Apers LM
Trop Doct; 2000 Apr; 30(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 10842554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Barnardo's misleading survey: publicity at what cost?
McCartney M
BMJ; 2011 Nov; 343():d7802. PubMed ID: 22131214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Pollsters struggle to explain failures of US presidential forecasts.
Skibba R
Nature; 2016 Nov; 539(7629):339. PubMed ID: 27853221
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Polling Americans on birth control and population.
Lipson G; Wolman D
Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Jan; 4(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 5020857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Canadian SF-36 health survey: normative data add to its value.
Wood-Dauphinee S
CMAJ; 2000 Aug; 163(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 10951725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How much do we count? Interpretation and error-making in the decennial census.
Iversen RR; Furstenberg FF; Belzer AA
Demography; 1999 Feb; 36(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 10036597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Missing voices: polling and health care.
Berinsky AJ; Margolis M
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2011 Dec; 36(6):975-87. PubMed ID: 22232421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.
Grava-Gubins I; Scott S
Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18854472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Postal surveys versus electronic mail surveys. The tortoise and the hare revisited.
Mavis BE; Brocato JJ
Eval Health Prof; 1998 Sep; 21(3):395-408. PubMed ID: 10350958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What Americans really think about abortion.
Hunter JD
First Things; 1992; 24():13-21. PubMed ID: 11656164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How to judge a book by its network.
Nature; 2017 Apr; 544(7648):5-6. PubMed ID: 28383010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulating genetically modified food. Policy trajectories, political culture, and risk perceptions in the U.S., Canada, and EU.
Wohlers AE
Politics Life Sci; 2010 Sep; 29(2):17-39. PubMed ID: 21761979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multistage sampling.
Sedgwick P
BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h4155. PubMed ID: 26231184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Indexing America's sleep health.
Hirshkowitz M
Sleep Health; 2017 Aug; 3(4):232-233. PubMed ID: 28709507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Social science. Do voter surveys underestimate the impact of racial bias?
Couzin J
Science; 2008 Oct; 322(5899):180-1. PubMed ID: 18845721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Data collection and reporting for healthcare disparities.
Garvin JH; Jones TD; Washington L; Weeks C
J AHIMA; 2009 Apr; 80(4):40-3. PubMed ID: 19418910
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. An experimental comparison of telephone and personal health interview surveys.
Thornberry OT
Vital Health Stat 2; 1987 Aug; (106):1-4. PubMed ID: 15791749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
