These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27763336)

  • 1. A realistic dynamic blower energy consumption model for wastewater applications.
    Amerlinck Y; De Keyser W; Urchegui G; Nopens I
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Oct; 74(7):1561-1576. PubMed ID: 27763336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a model for activated sludge aeration systems: linking air supply, distribution, and demand.
    Schraa O; Rieger L; Alex J
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):552-560. PubMed ID: 28192349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost minimization in a full-scale conventional wastewater treatment plant: associated costs of biological energy consumption versus sludge production.
    Sid S; Volant A; Lesage G; Heran M
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Nov; 76(9-10):2473-2481. PubMed ID: 29144305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modelling energy costs for different operational strategies of a large water resource recovery facility.
    Póvoa P; Oehmen A; Inocêncio P; Matos JS; Frazão A
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 May; 75(9-10):2139-2148. PubMed ID: 28498126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards advanced aeration modelling: from blower to bubbles to bulk.
    Amaral A; Schraa O; Rieger L; Gillot S; Fayolle Y; Bellandi G; Amerlinck Y; Mortier ST; Gori R; Neves R; Nopens I
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 75(3-4):507-517. PubMed ID: 28192345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reverse flexing as a physical/mechanical treatment to mitigate fouling of fine bubble diffusers.
    Odize VO; Novak J; De Clippeleir H; Al-Omari A; Smeraldi JD; Murthy S; Rosso D
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Oct; 76(7-8):1595-1602. PubMed ID: 28991777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design of fine-bubble aeration systems for municipal WWTPs with high sea salt concentrations.
    Sander S; Behnisch J; Wagner M
    Water Sci Technol; 2017 Apr; 75(7-8):1555-1563. PubMed ID: 28402296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation and optimization of a coking wastewater biological treatment process by activated sludge models (ASM).
    Wu X; Yang Y; Wu G; Mao J; Zhou T
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan; 165():235-242. PubMed ID: 26439861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic air supply models add realism to the evaluation of control strategies in water resource recovery facilities.
    Juan-García P; Kiser MA; Schraa O; Rieger L; Corominas L
    Water Sci Technol; 2018 Oct; 78(5-6):1104-1114. PubMed ID: 30339535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Energy self-sufficient sewage wastewater treatment plants: is optimized anaerobic sludge digestion the key?
    Jenicek P; Kutil J; Benes O; Todt V; Zabranska J; Dohanyos M
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(8):1739-44. PubMed ID: 24185054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Potentials and limits of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge: energy self-sufficient municipal wastewater treatment plant?
    Jenicek P; Bartacek J; Kutil J; Zabranska J; Dohanyos M
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(6):1277-81. PubMed ID: 22828306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Examples of energy self-sufficient municipal nutrient removal plants.
    Nowak O; Keil S; Fimml C
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22053450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Model based evaluation of plant improvement at a large wastewater treatment plant (WWTP).
    Drewnowski J; Remiszewska-Skwarek A; Fernandez-Morales FJ
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2018 Jun; 53(7):669-675. PubMed ID: 29465297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Energy shifting in wastewater treatment using compressed oxygen from integrated hydrogen production.
    Donald R; Love JG
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Apr; 331():117205. PubMed ID: 36638719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling solution for estimating aeration energy of wastewater treatment plants.
    Pöyry L; Ukkonen P; Mulas M; Mikola A
    Water Sci Technol; 2021 Dec; 84(12):3941-3951. PubMed ID: 34928854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Energy audit in small wastewater treatment plants: methodology, energy consumption indicators, and lessons learned.
    Foladori P; Vaccari M; Vitali F
    Water Sci Technol; 2015; 72(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 26360762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling oxygen transfer using dynamic alpha factors.
    Jiang LM; Garrido-Baserba M; Nolasco D; Al-Omari A; DeClippeleir H; Murthy S; Rosso D
    Water Res; 2017 Nov; 124():139-148. PubMed ID: 28753496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of energy consumption during aerobic sewage sludge treatment in dairy wastewater treatment plant.
    Dąbrowski W; Żyłka R; Malinowski P
    Environ Res; 2017 Feb; 153():135-139. PubMed ID: 27951462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oxygen transfer improvement in MBBR process.
    Collivignarelli MC; Abbà A; Bertanza G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Apr; 26(11):10727-10737. PubMed ID: 30778935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Aeration optimization through operation at low dissolved oxygen concentrations: Evaluation of oxygen mass transfer dynamics in different activated sludge systems.
    Fan H; Qi L; Liu G; Zhang Y; Fan Q; Wang H
    J Environ Sci (China); 2017 May; 55():224-235. PubMed ID: 28477817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.