BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27763994)

  • 1. Invasive validation of a novel brachial cuff-based oscillometric device (SphygmoCor XCEL) for measuring central blood pressure.
    Shoji T; Nakagomi A; Okada S; Ohno Y; Kobayashi Y
    J Hypertens; 2017 Jan; 35(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 27763994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation Study to Determine the Accuracy of Central Blood Pressure Measurement Using the Sphygmocor Xcel Cuff Device.
    Schultz MG; Picone DS; Armstrong MK; Black JA; Dwyer N; Roberts-Thomson P; Sharman JE
    Hypertension; 2020 Jul; 76(1):244-250. PubMed ID: 32475318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement accuracy of a stand-alone oscillometric central blood pressure monitor: a validation report for Microlife WatchBP Office Central.
    Cheng HM; Sung SH; Shih YT; Chuang SY; Yu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 26(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 23382326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity of the augmentation index and pulse pressure amplification as determined by the SphygmoCor XCEL device: a comparison with invasive measurements.
    Nakagomi A; Shoji T; Okada S; Ohno Y; Kobayashi Y
    Hypertens Res; 2018 Jan; 41(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 28978987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oscillometric estimation of central blood pressure: validation of the Mobil-O-Graph in comparison with the SphygmoCor device.
    Weiss W; Gohlisch C; Harsch-Gladisch C; Tölle M; Zidek W; van der Giet M
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Jun; 17(3):128-31. PubMed ID: 22561735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of calibration approaches on the accuracy of oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement.
    Gotzmann M; Hogeweg M; Bauer F; Seibert FS; Rohn BJ; Mügge A; Babel N; Westhoff TH
    J Hypertens; 2020 Nov; 38(11):2154-2160. PubMed ID: 32649641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of the noninvasive assessment of central blood pressure by the SphygmoCor and Omron devices against the invasive catheter measurement.
    Ding FH; Fan WX; Zhang RY; Zhang Q; Li Y; Wang JG
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1306-11. PubMed ID: 21976274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of the calibration error in the transfer function-derived central aortic blood pressures.
    Shih YT; Cheng HM; Sung SH; Hu WC; Chen CH
    Am J Hypertens; 2011 Dec; 24(12):1312-7. PubMed ID: 21850061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of fully automated oscillometric central aortic blood pressure measurement techniques.
    Gotzmann M; Hogeweg M; Seibert FS; Rohn BJ; Bergbauer M; Babel N; Bauer F; Mügge A; Westhoff TH
    J Hypertens; 2020 Feb; 38(2):235-242. PubMed ID: 31503132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the SphygmoCor XCEL device with applanation tonometry for pulse wave velocity and central blood pressure assessment in youth.
    Stabouli S; Printza N; Zervas C; Dotis J; Chrysaidou K; Maliahova O; Antza C; Papachristou F; Kotsis V
    J Hypertens; 2019 Jan; 37(1):30-36. PubMed ID: 29939943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation study to determine the accuracy of central blood pressure measurement using the SphygmoCor XCEL cuff device in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
    De la Torre Hernández JM; Veiga Fernandez G; Brown J; Sainz Laso F; Lee DH; Fradejas V; Garcia Camarero T; Elmariah S; Inglessis I; Zueco J; Vazquez de Prada JA; Ben-Assa E; Edelman ER
    J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich); 2021 Jun; 23(6):1165-1175. PubMed ID: 33942487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of invasive and brachial cuff-based noninvasive measurements for the assessment of blood pressure amplification.
    Nakagomi A; Okada S; Shoji T; Kobayashi Y
    Hypertens Res; 2017 Mar; 40(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27761001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a brachial cuff-based method for estimating central systolic blood pressure.
    Weber T; Wassertheurer S; Rammer M; Maurer E; Hametner B; Mayer CC; Kropf J; Eber B
    Hypertension; 2011 Nov; 58(5):825-32. PubMed ID: 21911710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Central Blood Pressure Estimated by a Cuff-Based Device With Radial Tonometry.
    Peng X; Schultz MG; Abhayaratna WP; Stowasser M; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2016 Oct; 29(10):1173-8. PubMed ID: 27317573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of central blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes: a comparison between SphygmoCor and invasively measured values.
    Laugesen E; Rossen NB; Peters CD; Mæng M; Ebbehøj E; Knudsen ST; Hansen KW; Bøtker HE; Poulsen PL
    Am J Hypertens; 2014 Feb; 27(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 24304654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the Vicorder, a novel cuff-based device for the noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure.
    Pucci G; Cheriyan J; Hubsch A; Hickson SS; Gajendragadkar PR; Watson T; O'Sullivan M; Woodcock-Smith J; Schillaci G; Wilkinson IB; McEniery CM
    J Hypertens; 2013 Jan; 31(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 23079681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
    Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity and reliability of central blood pressure estimated by upper arm oscillometric cuff pressure.
    Climie RE; Schultz MG; Nikolic SB; Ahuja KD; Fell JW; Sharman JE
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 25(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 22223041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of blood pressure and pulse pressure values obtained by oscillometric and central measurements in hypertensive patients.
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Yilmaz R; Demir K; Dogan Y; Ozhan H; Alihanoglu Y; Koc F; Bodur S
    Blood Press; 2010 Apr; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 20070247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?
    Goonasekera CD; Dillon MJ
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 Nov; 9(11):885-9. PubMed ID: 8583467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.