These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27764142)

  • 21. Propranolol reverses open field effects on frustration.
    Justel N; Psyrdellis M; Pautassi RM; Mustaca A
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2014 Dec; 116():105-11. PubMed ID: 25261228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Opioid receptors modulate recovery from consummatory successive negative contrast.
    Pellegrini S; Wood M; Daniel AM; Papini MR
    Behav Brain Res; 2005 Nov; 164(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 16135386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Posttrial corticosterone administration enhances the effects of incentive downshift: exploring the boundaries of this effect.
    Ruetti E; Justel N; Mustaca AE; Papini MR
    Behav Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 123(1):137-44. PubMed ID: 19170438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impairment of recovery from incentive downshift after lesions of the anterior cingulate cortex: emotional or cognitive deficits?
    Ortega LA; Uhelski M; Fuchs PN; Papini MR
    Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 125(6):988-95. PubMed ID: 22023099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychological pain and opioid receptors: Reward downshift is disrupted when tested in a context signaling morphine.
    Ruiz-Salas JC; de la Casa LG; Torres C; Papini MR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2022 May; 216():173386. PubMed ID: 35398142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Lesions of nucleus accumbens reduce instrumental but not consummatory negative contrast in rats.
    Leszczuk MH; Flaherty CF
    Behav Brain Res; 2000 Nov; 116(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 11090886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Chronic restricted access to 10% sucrose solution in adolescent and young adult rats impairs spatial memory and alters sensitivity to outcome devaluation.
    Kendig MD; Boakes RA; Rooney KB; Corbit LH
    Physiol Behav; 2013 Aug; 120():164-72. PubMed ID: 23954407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Consummatory suppression due to incentive downshift is not a consequence of enhanced search behavior.
    Lopez Seal MF; Cuenya L; Suarez AB; Mustaca AE
    Behav Processes; 2013 Sep; 98():69-71. PubMed ID: 23694741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Complex effects of reward upshift on consummatory behavior.
    Annicchiarico I; Glueck AC; Cuenya L; Kawasaki K; Conrad SE; Papini MR
    Behav Processes; 2016 Aug; 129():54-67. PubMed ID: 27298234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reward loss and the basolateral amygdala: A function in reward comparisons.
    Kawasaki K; Annicchiarico I; Glueck AC; Morón I; Papini MR
    Behav Brain Res; 2017 Jul; 331():205-213. PubMed ID: 28511980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Trial-selective effects of U50,488H, a kappa-opioid receptor agonist, on consummatory successive negative contrast.
    Wood MD; Norris JN; Daniel AM; Papini MR
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 193(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 18514923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Memory interfering effects of chlordiazepoxide on consummatory successive negative contrast.
    Ortega LA; Glueck AC; Daniel AM; Prado-Rivera MA; White MM; Papini MR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2014 Jan; 116():96-106. PubMed ID: 24316347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Proactive interference of open field on consummatory successive negative contrast.
    Justel N; Pautassi R; Mustaca A
    Learn Behav; 2014 Mar; 42(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 24142800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Excitotoxic lesions of the gustatory thalamus eliminate consummatory but not instrumental successive negative contrast in rats.
    Sastre A; Reilly S
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 170(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16530861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An unexpected reduction in sucrose concentration activates the HPA axis on successive post shift days without attenuation by discriminative contextual stimuli.
    Pecoraro N; de Jong H; Dallman MF
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Mar; 96(4-5):651-61. PubMed ID: 19162053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Differential effects of removing the glucose or saccharin components of a glucose-saccharin mixture in a successive negative contrast paradigm.
    Mitchell CP; Flaherty CF
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Mar; 84(4):579-83. PubMed ID: 15811393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ethanol- and sucrose-reinforced appetitive and consummatory responding in HAD1, HAD2, and P rats.
    Czachowski CL; Samson HH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2002 Nov; 26(11):1653-61. PubMed ID: 12436053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of gustatory and postingestive actions of sweeteners in the generation of positive affect as evaluated by place preference conditioning.
    Agmo A; Marroquin E
    Appetite; 1997 Dec; 29(3):269-89. PubMed ID: 9468761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Persisting adiposity following chronic consumption of 10% sucrose solution: strain differences and behavioural effects.
    Kendig MD; Rooney KB; Corbit LH; Boakes RA
    Physiol Behav; 2014 May; 130():54-65. PubMed ID: 24662698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Instrumental outcome devaluation with representation-mediated conditioning.
    Iguchi Y; Ishii K
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 19429203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.