266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27764531)
1. The effect of image quality, repeated study, and assessment method on anatomy learning.
Fenesi B; Mackinnon C; Cheng L; Kim JA; Wainman BC
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):249-261. PubMed ID: 27764531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Take away body parts! An investigation into the use of 3D-printed anatomical models in undergraduate anatomy education.
Smith CF; Tollemache N; Covill D; Johnston M
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 28753247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The skeletons in our closet: E-learning tools and what happens when one side does not fit all.
Van Nuland SE; Rogers KA
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):570-588. PubMed ID: 28575530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Williams AM; Zimitat C
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Nov; 10(6):514-527. PubMed ID: 28423232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Online dissection audio-visual resources for human anatomy: Undergraduate medical students' usage and learning outcomes.
Choi-Lundberg DL; Cuellar WA; Williams AM
Anat Sci Educ; 2016 Nov; 9(6):545-554. PubMed ID: 27802370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hands-on or no hands-on training in ultrasound imaging: A randomized trial to evaluate learning outcomes and speed of recall of topographic anatomy.
Knudsen L; Nawrotzki R; Schmiedl A; Mühlfeld C; Kruschinski C; Ochs M
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Nov; 11(6):575-591. PubMed ID: 29683560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interactive anatomical and surgical live stream lectures improve students' academic performance in applied clinical anatomy.
Shiozawa T; Butz B; Herlan S; Kramer A; Hirt B
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jan; 10(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 27273871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptions of first-year medical students towards learning anatomy using cadaveric specimens through peer teaching.
Agius A; Calleja N; Camenzuli C; Sultana R; Pullicino R; Zammit C; Calleja Agius J; Pomara C
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jul; 11(4):346-357. PubMed ID: 29112798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measuring medical students' motivation to learning anatomy by cadaveric dissection.
Abdel Meguid EM; Khalil MK
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):363-371. PubMed ID: 27925681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implementation and modification of an anatomy-based integrated curriculum.
Klement BJ; Paulsen DF; Wineski LE
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):262-275. PubMed ID: 28009487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cognitive load imposed by ultrasound-facilitated teaching does not adversely affect gross anatomy learning outcomes.
Jamniczky HA; Cotton D; Paget M; Ramji Q; Lenz R; McLaughlin K; Coderre S; Ma IW
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):144-151. PubMed ID: 27533319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Longitudinal retention of anatomical knowledge in second-year medical students.
Doomernik DE; van Goor H; Kooloos JGM; Ten Broek RP
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):242-248. PubMed ID: 27706913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cadaveric dissection as an educational tool for anatomical sciences in the 21st century.
Ghosh SK
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jun; 10(3):286-299. PubMed ID: 27574911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning of cross-sectional anatomy using clay models.
Oh CS; Kim JY; Choe YH
Anat Sci Educ; 2009; 2(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 19588481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Benefits of an Augmented Reality Magic Mirror System for Integrated Radiology Teaching in Gross Anatomy.
Bork F; Stratmann L; Enssle S; Eck U; Navab N; Waschke J; Kugelmann D
Anat Sci Educ; 2019 Nov; 12(6):585-598. PubMed ID: 30697948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an innovative hands-on anatomy-centered ultrasound curriculum to supplement graduate gross anatomy education.
Royer DF; Kessler R; Stowell JR
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):348-362. PubMed ID: 27870531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance equivalency between computer-based and traditional pen-and-paper assessment: A case study in clinical anatomy.
Guimarães B; Ribeiro J; Cruz B; Ferreira A; Alves H; Cruz-Correia R; Madeira MD; Ferreira MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Mar; 11(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28817229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course.
Melovitz Vasan CA; DeFouw DO; Holland BK; Vasan NS
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 May; 11(3):254-261. PubMed ID: 28941215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation by medical students of the educational value of multi-material and multi-colored three-dimensional printed models of the upper limb for anatomical education.
Mogali SR; Yeong WY; Tan HKJ; Tan GJS; Abrahams PH; Zary N; Low-Beer N; Ferenczi MA
Anat Sci Educ; 2018 Jan; 11(1):54-64. PubMed ID: 28544582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring the impact of the flipped anatomy classroom: The importance of categorizing an assessment by Bloom's taxonomy.
Morton DA; Colbert-Getz JM
Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Mar; 10(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 27427860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
