207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27765014)
1. Distinct transcriptome responses to water limitation in isohydric and anisohydric grapevine cultivars.
Dal Santo S; Palliotti A; Zenoni S; Tornielli GB; Fasoli M; Paci P; Tombesi S; Frioni T; Silvestroni O; Bellincontro A; d'Onofrio C; Matarese F; Gatti M; Poni S; Pezzotti M
BMC Genomics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):815. PubMed ID: 27765014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Drought tolerance of the grapevine, Vitis champinii cv. Ramsey, is associated with higher photosynthesis and greater transcriptomic responsiveness of abscisic acid biosynthesis and signaling.
Cochetel N; Ghan R; Toups HS; Degu A; Tillett RL; Schlauch KA; Cramer GR
BMC Plant Biol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32019503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcriptomic network analyses of leaf dehydration responses identify highly connected ABA and ethylene signaling hubs in three grapevine species differing in drought tolerance.
Hopper DW; Ghan R; Schlauch KA; Cramer GR
BMC Plant Biol; 2016 May; 16(1):118. PubMed ID: 27215785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transcriptomic and genomic structural variation analyses on grape cultivars reveal new insights into the genotype-dependent responses to water stress.
Catacchio CR; Alagna F; Perniola R; Bergamini C; Rotunno S; Calabrese FM; Crupi P; Antonacci D; Ventura M; Cardone MF
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):2809. PubMed ID: 30809001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. VviERF6Ls: an expanded clade in Vitis responds transcriptionally to abiotic and biotic stresses and berry development.
Toups HS; Cochetel N; Gray D; Cramer GR
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):472. PubMed ID: 32646368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of grapevine berry ripening reveals a set of genes similarly modulated during three seasons and the occurrence of an oxidative burst at vèraison.
Pilati S; Perazzolli M; Malossini A; Cestaro A; Demattè L; Fontana P; Dal Ri A; Viola R; Velasco R; Moser C
BMC Genomics; 2007 Nov; 8():428. PubMed ID: 18034875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs Grenache×Syrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought.
Coupel-Ledru A; Lebon É; Christophe A; Doligez A; Cabrera-Bosquet L; Péchier P; Hamard P; This P; Simonneau T
J Exp Bot; 2014 Nov; 65(21):6205-18. PubMed ID: 25381432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transcriptomic response is more sensitive to water deficit in shoots than roots of Vitis riparia (Michx.).
Khadka VS; Vaughn K; Xie J; Swaminathan P; Ma Q; Cramer GR; Fennell AY
BMC Plant Biol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):72. PubMed ID: 30760212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Near isohydric grapevine cultivar displays higher photosynthetic efficiency and photorespiration rates under drought stress as compared with near anisohydric grapevine cultivar.
Hochberg U; Degu A; Fait A; Rachmilevitch S
Physiol Plant; 2013 Apr; 147(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 22901023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Accumulation of miRNAs Differentially Modulated by Drought Stress Is Affected by Grafting in Grapevine.
Pagliarani C; Vitali M; Ferrero M; Vitulo N; Incarbone M; Lovisolo C; Valle G; Schubert A
Plant Physiol; 2017 Apr; 173(4):2180-2195. PubMed ID: 28235889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Profiling of sugar transporter genes in grapevine coping with water deficit.
Medici A; Laloi M; Atanassova R
FEBS Lett; 2014 Nov; 588(21):3989-97. PubMed ID: 25261250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genome-wide analysis and expression profile of the bZIP transcription factor gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera).
Liu J; Chen N; Chen F; Cai B; Dal Santo S; Tornielli GB; Pezzotti M; Cheng ZM
BMC Genomics; 2014 Apr; 15():281. PubMed ID: 24725365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ABA-mediated responses to water deficit separate grapevine genotypes by their genetic background.
Rossdeutsch L; Edwards E; Cookson SJ; Barrieu F; Gambetta GA; Delrot S; Ollat N
BMC Plant Biol; 2016 Apr; 16():91. PubMed ID: 27091220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Comparison of Petiole Hydraulics and Aquaporin Expression in an Anisohydric and Isohydric Cultivar of Grapevine in Response to Water-Stress Induced Cavitation.
Shelden MC; Vandeleur R; Kaiser BN; Tyerman SD
Front Plant Sci; 2017; 8():1893. PubMed ID: 29163613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transcriptomic and metabolite analyses of Cabernet Sauvignon grape berry development.
Deluc LG; Grimplet J; Wheatley MD; Tillett RL; Quilici DR; Osborne C; Schooley DA; Schlauch KA; Cushman JC; Cramer GR
BMC Genomics; 2007 Nov; 8():429. PubMed ID: 18034876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of plasma membrane intrinsic protein aquaporins in water transport through roots: diurnal and drought stress responses reveal different strategies between isohydric and anisohydric cultivars of grapevine.
Vandeleur RK; Mayo G; Shelden MC; Gilliham M; Kaiser BN; Tyerman SD
Plant Physiol; 2009 Jan; 149(1):445-60. PubMed ID: 18987216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative transcriptome analysis of grapevine in response to copper stress.
Leng X; Jia H; Sun X; Shangguan L; Mu Q; Wang B; Fang J
Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17749. PubMed ID: 26673527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological parameters and protective energy dissipation mechanisms expressed in the leaves of two Vitis vinifera L. genotypes under multiple summer stresses.
Palliotti A; Tombesi S; Frioni T; Silvestroni O; Lanari V; D'Onofrio C; Matarese F; Bellincontro A; Poni S
J Plant Physiol; 2015 Aug; 185():84-92. PubMed ID: 26310367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transcriptome changes in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Malbec leaves induced by ultraviolet-B radiation.
Pontin MA; Piccoli PN; Francisco R; Bottini R; Martinez-Zapater JM; Lijavetzky D
BMC Plant Biol; 2010 Oct; 10():224. PubMed ID: 20959019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationships between stomatal behavior, xylem vulnerability to cavitation and leaf water relations in two cultivars of Vitis vinifera.
Tombesi S; Nardini A; Farinelli D; Palliotti A
Physiol Plant; 2014 Nov; 152(3):453-64. PubMed ID: 24597791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
