185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27765393)
1. Effect of polyvinyl siloxane impression material on the polymerization of composite resin.
Chen L; Kleverlaan CJ; Liang K; Yang D
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Apr; 117(4):552-558. PubMed ID: 27765393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microhardness of light- and dual-polymerizable luting resins polymerized through 7.5-mm-thick endocrowns.
Gregor L; Bouillaguet S; Onisor I; Ardu S; Krejci I; Rocca GT
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):942-8. PubMed ID: 24767899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of various interim fixed prosthodontic materials on the polymerization of elastomeric impression materials.
Al-Sowygh ZH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):176-81. PubMed ID: 24559525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Margin adaptation of indirect composite inlays fabricated on flexible dies.
Price RB; Gerrow JD
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10709039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of various base/core materials on the setting of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Moon MG; Jarrett TA; Morlen RA; Fallo GJ
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Dec; 76(6):608-12. PubMed ID: 8957786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polyvinyl siloxane impression materials: a review of properties and techniques.
Chee WW; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):728-32. PubMed ID: 1432791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of pre-heated composites and flowable liners on Class II gingival margin gap formation.
Sabatini C; Blunck U; Denehy G; Munoz C
Oper Dent; 2010; 35(6):663-71. PubMed ID: 21180006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR
Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of five brands of latex gloves on the setting time of polyvinyl siloxane putty impression materials.
Ravikumar CM; Sangur R
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 22945711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Influence of Nitrile Gloves on the Setting Behavior of Polyvinyl Siloxane Putty Impression Materials.
Delgado AJ; Amaya-Pajares SP; Su Y; Behar-Horenstein L; Donovan TE
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):40-45. PubMed ID: 29469997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of material waste, dimensional stability, and detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials mixed with different mixing tips.
Maluly-Proni AT; Delben JA; Briso ALF; Marson FC; Dos Santos PH
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):759-764. PubMed ID: 33454110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Indirect inhibition of polymerization of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material: a case report.
Chee WW; Donovan TE; Kahn RL
Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 2068247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of mixing technique on shrinkage rate of one polyether and two polyvinyl siloxane impression materials.
Lampé I; Marton S; Hegedüs C
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(5):590. PubMed ID: 15543917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of provisional luting agents on polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Jones RH; Cook GS; Moon MG
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Apr; 75(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 8642519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of chlorine-based and quaternary ammonium-based disinfectants on the wettability of a polyvinyl siloxane impression material.
Kang YS; Rueggeberg F; Ramos V
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):266-270. PubMed ID: 27765401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
Abdullah MA; Talic YF
J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
