These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27765393)

  • 21. The effect of temperature changes on the dimensional stability of polyvinyl siloxane and polyether impression materials.
    Corso M; Abanomy A; Di Canzio J; Zurakowski D; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jun; 79(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 9627890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microhardness of resin composites polymerized by plasma arc or conventional visible light curing.
    Park SH; Krejci I; Lutz F
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 11817467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of mixing technique on surface characteristics of impression materials.
    Lepe X; Johnson GH; Berg JC; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):495-502. PubMed ID: 9597600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Use of polyvinyl siloxane material for an altered cast impression tray.
    Hsu YT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):695-6. PubMed ID: 24657176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Silicone impression materials and latex gloves. Is interaction fact or fallacy?
    Walid Y; Al-Ani Z; Gray R
    Dent Update; 2012; 39(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 22720379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of surfactant on surface hardness of dental stone and investment casts produced from polyvinyl siloxane duplicating materials.
    Al-Johani A; Clark RK; Juszczyk AS; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2008 Jun; 16(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 18637383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Disinfection of polyvinyl siloxane impression material by gaseous ozone.
    Celebi H; Büyükerkmen EB; Torlak E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 29310874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
    Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of three polyvinyl siloxane putty-wash impression techniques.
    Nissan J; Laufer BZ; Brosh T; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Feb; 83(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 10668027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Selected characteristics of a new polyvinyl siloxane impression material--a randomized clinical trial.
    Blatz MB; Sadan A; Burgess JO; Mercante D; Hoist S
    Quintessence Int; 2005 Feb; 36(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15732545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The linear shrinkage and microhardness of packable composites polymerized by QTH or PAC unit.
    Park SH; Noh BD; Cho YS; Kim SS
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 16536187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of matrix type on surface roughness of three resins for provisional crowns and fixed partial dentures.
    Ayuso-Montero R; Martinez-Gomis J; Lujan-Climent M; Salsench J; Peraire M
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 19054307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of transparent vinyl polysiloxane in a minimally invasive approach for creating composite resin undercuts for partial removable dental prostheses.
    Varjão FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jan; 107(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22230916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
    de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of tray rigidity and impression technique on accuracy of polyvinyl siloxane impressions.
    Hoyos A; Soderholm KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 21210004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of two impression techniques for single-tooth implants.
    Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11843452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Microhardness of dual-polymerizing resin cements and foundation composite resins for luting fiber-reinforced posts.
    Yoshida K; Meng X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jun; 111(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 24412184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.