318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27765399)
1. Comparison of retention between maxillary milled and conventional denture bases: A clinical study.
AlHelal A; AlRumaih HS; Kattadiyil MT; Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):233-238. PubMed ID: 27765399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of denture adhesive on the retention of milled and heat-activated maxillary denture bases: A clinical study.
AlRumaih HS; AlHelal A; Baba NZ; Goodacre CJ; Al-Qahtani A; Kattadiyil MT
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):361-366. PubMed ID: 29551377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part I - Conventional versus CAD-CAM methods: A clinical controlled crossover study.
Maniewicz S; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Chebib N
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):611-617. PubMed ID: 36116950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fit and retention of complete denture bases: Part II - conventional impressions versus digital scans: A clinical controlled crossover study.
Chebib N; Imamura Y; El Osta N; Srinivasan M; Müller F; Maniewicz S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):618-625. PubMed ID: 36055812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparison of Denture Base Retention and Adaptation Between CAD/CAM and Conventional Fabrication Techniques.
Faty MA; Sabet ME; Thabet YG
Int J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; 36(4):469-478. PubMed ID: 37699188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM maxillary denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Hwang HJ; Lee SJ; Park EJ; Yoon HI
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 30006217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Dimensional Changes Between CAD-CAM Milled Complete Denture Bases and 3D Printed Complete Denture Bases: An In Vitro Study.
Helal MA; Abdelrahim RA; Zeidan AAE
J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(S1):11-19. PubMed ID: 35524633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of denture tooth movement between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques.
Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ; Kattadiyil MT
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):108-115. PubMed ID: 28506652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Denture Base Adaptation Fabricated Using Conventional, Subtractive, and Additive Technologies: A Volumetric Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis.
Oğuz Eİ; Kılıçarslan MA; Özcan M; Ocak M; Bilecenoğlu B; Orhan K
J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):257-263. PubMed ID: 33415779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the trueness and tissue surface adaptation of CAD-CAM mandibular denture bases manufactured using digital light processing.
Yoon HI; Hwang HJ; Ohkubo C; Han JS; Park EJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):919-926. PubMed ID: 29961610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of fabrication techniques on denture base adaptation: An in vitro study.
Hsu CY; Yang TC; Wang TM; Lin LD
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):740-747. PubMed ID: 32448642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stainability of acrylic resin materials used in CAD-CAM and conventional complete dentures.
Al-Qarni FD; Goodacre CJ; Kattadiyil MT; Baba NZ; Paravina RD
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):880-887. PubMed ID: 31703924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of adding a hard-reline material on the flexural strength of conventional, 3D-printed, and milled denture base materials.
Li R; Malik D; Sadid-Zadeh R
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):796.e1-796.e7. PubMed ID: 37121624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CAD/CAM complete dentures: a review of two commercial fabrication systems.
Kattadiyil MT; Goodacre CJ; Baba NZ
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2013 Jun; 41(6):407-16. PubMed ID: 23875432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of anterior denture tooth arrangements of CAD-CAM complete removable dental prostheses made with a tooth mold template.
Sierra JA; Cho SH; Maroulakos G
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Mar; 129(3):472-477. PubMed ID: 34330530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy and retention of denture base fabricated by heat curing and additive manufacturing.
Tasaka A; Matsunaga S; Odaka K; Ishizaki K; Ueda T; Abe S; Yoshinari M; Yamashita S; Sakurai K
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):85-89. PubMed ID: 30584053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of intraoral digital scanning for a CAD/CAM-fabricated milled bar and superstructure framework for an implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis.
Lin WS; Chou JC; Metz MJ; Harris BT; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):509-15. PubMed ID: 25862270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flexural strength of denture base acrylic resins processed by conventional and CAD-CAM methods.
Aguirre BC; Chen JH; Kontogiorgos ED; Murchison DF; Nagy WW
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):641-646. PubMed ID: 31353106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of repair resin type and surface treatment on the repair strength of heat-polymerized denture base resin.
Alkurt M; Yeşil Duymuş Z; Gundogdu M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24161257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CAD/CAM produces dentures with improved fit.
Steinmassl O; Dumfahrt H; Grunert I; Steinmassl PA
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Nov; 22(8):2829-2835. PubMed ID: 29468600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
