These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 27765846)

  • 21. Comparison of cardiac output determined by bioimpedance and bioreactance methods at rest and during exercise.
    Jakovljevic DG; Moore S; Hallsworth K; Fattakhova G; Thoma C; Trenell MI
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2012 Apr; 26(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 22234400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison between freon and acetylene rebreathing for measuring cardiac output.
    Bonde-Petersen F; Norsk P; Suzuki Y
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1980 Nov; 51(11):1214-21. PubMed ID: 7213267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-invasive assessment of cardiac output during exercise in healthy young humans: comparison between Modelflow method and Doppler echocardiography method.
    Sugawara J; Tanabe T; Miyachi M; Yamamoto K; Takahashi K; Iemitsu M; Otsuki T; Homma S; Maeda S; Ajisaka R; Matsuda M
    Acta Physiol Scand; 2003 Dec; 179(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 14656373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Noninvasive determination of cardiac output by a modified acetylene rebreathing procedure utilizing mass spectrometer measurements.
    Triebwasser JH; Johnson RL; Burpo RP; Campbell JC; Reardon WC; Blomqvist CG
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1977 Mar; 48(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 857797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Reliability of first-pass radionuclide determination of cardiac output in the upright position at rest and during exercise.
    Kelbaek H; Gjørup T; Hvid-Jacobsen K; Skagen K; Munck O; Godtfredsen J; Heslet L
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1992; 19(11):955-9. PubMed ID: 1425782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of cardiac performance: short- and medium-term variability of impedance cardiography at rest and during dynamic exercise.
    Sundberg S; Akkila J
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1996 Mar; 34(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 8705093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.
    Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J
    Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of meal ingestion on blood pressure and regional hemodynamic responses after exercise.
    Endo MY; Fujihara C; Miura A; Kashima H; Fukuba Y
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2016 Jun; 120(11):1343-8. PubMed ID: 26917697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Feasibility and reproducibility of noninvasive 24-h ambulatory aortic blood pressure monitoring with a brachial cuff-based oscillometric device.
    Protogerou AD; Argyris A; Nasothimiou E; Vrachatis D; Papaioannou TG; Tzamouranis D; Blacher J; Safar ME; Sfikakis P; Stergiou GS
    Am J Hypertens; 2012 Aug; 25(8):876-82. PubMed ID: 22673021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of noninvasive cardiac output measurements using the Nexfin monitoring device and the esophageal Doppler.
    Chen G; Meng L; Alexander B; Tran NP; Kain ZN; Cannesson M
    J Clin Anesth; 2012 Jun; 24(4):275-83. PubMed ID: 22608581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Noninvasive assessment of endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation of the brachial artery.
    Uehata A; Lieberman EH; Gerhard MD; Anderson TJ; Ganz P; Polak JF; Creager MA; Yeung AC
    Vasc Med; 1997; 2(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 9546961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the ability of two continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output: estimated continuous cardiac output measured by modified pulse wave transit time and an arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device.
    Terada T; Oiwa A; Maemura Y; Robert S; Kessoku S; Ochiai R
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):621-7. PubMed ID: 26370094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Simultaneous determination of the accuracy and precision of closed-circuit cardiac output rebreathing techniques.
    Jarvis SS; Levine BD; Prisk GK; Shykoff BE; Elliott AR; Rosow E; Blomqvist CG; Pawelczyk JA
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2007 Sep; 103(3):867-74. PubMed ID: 17556490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measurement of cardiac output by open-circuit acetylene uptake: a computer model to quantify error caused by ventilation-perfusion inequality.
    Bogaard HJ; Wagner PD
    Physiol Meas; 2006 Oct; 27(10):1023-32. PubMed ID: 16951461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reproducibility of the acetylene rebreathe technique for determining cardiac output.
    Warburton DE; Gledhill N; Jamnik VK
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Jun; 30(6):952-7. PubMed ID: 9624657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cardiac Output Measurements Based on the Pulse Wave Transit Time and Thoracic Impedance Exhibit Limited Agreement With Thermodilution Method During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.
    Magliocca A; Rezoagli E; Anderson TA; Burns SM; Ichinose F; Chitilian HV
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Jan; 126(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 28598912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of changes in cardiac output on middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity at rest and during exercise.
    Ogoh S; Brothers RM; Barnes Q; Eubank WL; Hawkins MN; Purkayastha S; O-Yurvati A; Raven PB
    J Physiol; 2005 Dec; 569(Pt 2):697-704. PubMed ID: 16210355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can we obtain a noninvasive and continuous estimation of cardiac output? Comparison between three noninvasive methods.
    Raissuni Z; Zores F; Henriet O; Dallest S; Roul G
    Int Heart J; 2013; 54(6):395-400. PubMed ID: 24309450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance with acetylene uptake for measuring cardiac output.
    Wang E; Cruz C; Pettersen MR; Hoff J; Helgerud J
    Int J Sports Med; 2014 Oct; 35(11):925-32. PubMed ID: 24886928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Validation during exercise of a new device for cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time (comparison EsCCO(®) vs. Physioflow(®))].
    Stalter A; Lanot N; Bridon G; Julian V; Péreira B; Richard R
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2016 Feb; 65(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 25704727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.