These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2776589)

  • 21. FDA approves new Glucose Monitoring System.
    Klonoff DC
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(3):349. PubMed ID: 11475279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: limited use for portable blood-glucose measuring devices].
    Houweling ST; Kleefstra N; van Ballegooie E; Miedema K; Rischen R; Heeg JE
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Mar; 149(13):694-7. PubMed ID: 15819134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-invasive glucose monitoring technology in diabetes management: a review.
    Vashist SK
    Anal Chim Acta; 2012 Oct; 750():16-27. PubMed ID: 23062426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hopes, dreams, and reality: the long road to pain-free glucose testing.
    Taylor SA
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 1999; 1(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 11475278
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 2nd Annual Symposium on Self Monitoring of Blood Glucose (SMBG) Applications and Beyond, May 7-10, 2009, Berlin, Germany.
    Cuddihy R; Reach G
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2009 Sep; 11(9):539-49. PubMed ID: 19764833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring: the GlucoDay system.
    Maran A; Poscia A
    Diabetes Nutr Metab; 2002 Dec; 15(6):429-33. PubMed ID: 12678463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of Blood Glucose Meters in the Low-Glucose Range: Current Evaluations Indicate That it is not Sufficient From a Clinical Point of View.
    Heinemann L; Zijlstra E; Pleus S; Freckmann G
    Diabetes Care; 2015 Sep; 38(9):e139-40. PubMed ID: 26180110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [THE VERIFICATION OF ANALYTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THREE MODELS OF GLUCOMETERS].
    Timofeev AV; Khaibulina ET; Mamonov RA; Gorst KA
    Klin Lab Diagn; 2016 Jan; 61(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 27183728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accuracy of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System.
    Vanterpool GE
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):995-6. PubMed ID: 26892507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessing the analytical performance of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose: concepts of performance evaluation and definition of metrological key terms.
    Schnell O; Hinzmann R; Kulzer B; Freckmann G; Erbach M; Lodwig V; Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 7(6):1585-94. PubMed ID: 24351185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Blood glucose monitoring: does technology help?
    Page SR; Peacock I
    Diabet Med; 1993 Nov; 10(9):793-801. PubMed ID: 8281721
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The original Clarke Error Grid Analysis (EGA).
    Clarke WL
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Oct; 7(5):776-9. PubMed ID: 16241881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analytical Performance Requirements for Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose With Focus on System Accuracy: Relevant Differences Among ISO 15197:2003, ISO 15197:2013, and Current FDA Recommendations.
    Freckmann G; Schmid C; Baumstark A; Rutschmann M; Haug C; Heinemann L
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 9(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 25872965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Accuracy Evaluation of an Integrated Blood Glucose Monitoring System With Improved Test Cassettes Following ISO 15197:2013.
    Baumstark A; Kraft M; Hattemer A; Haug C; Freckmann G
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Oct; 10(1):242-4. PubMed ID: 26428935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High blood glucose. Regaining diabetes control.
    Mayo Clin Health Lett; 2013 May; 31(5):7. PubMed ID: 24701649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reimbursement and coverage implications for CGM.
    Aubry W
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Oct; 7(5):797-800. PubMed ID: 16241886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The bottom line. Can portable blood glucose monitoring improve the outcomes of diabetic patients?
    Speicher CE
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1991 Feb; 95(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 1992604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of noninvasive methods to monitor blood glucose levels in people with diabetes.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1998 Jul 22-29; 280(4):312-3. PubMed ID: 9686536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Where does capillary blood glucose stand following the IMPACT trial? Implications of a new way of measuring glucose in routine clinical practice.
    Aguilera E; Vázquez F
    Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr; 2017 Mar; 64(3):125-127. PubMed ID: 28440750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Use of continuous glucose monitoring to improve diabetes mellitus management.
    Ellis SL; Bookout T; Garg SK; Izuora KE
    Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am; 2007 Dec; 36 Suppl 2():46-68. PubMed ID: 18407033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.